Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 25;19(10):e0312233.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312233. eCollection 2024.

Capillary drops, capillary pooled, and venous blood samples for determining hemoglobin concentration using HemoCue: A measurement system analysis

Affiliations

Capillary drops, capillary pooled, and venous blood samples for determining hemoglobin concentration using HemoCue: A measurement system analysis

Ignacio Méndez-Gómez-Humarán et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Several external and internal factors can affect the performance and variability of Hemoglobin concentration [Hb] measurements using HemoCue, and documentation on the contribution of different sources of [Hb] variation is limited. We used an experimental repeated measurements design with nine randomly selected participants, three HemoCue devices, and three trained field workers. HemoCue measurements for all samples were repeated three times. The [Hb] measurement system considers four sources of error: 1) HemoCue devices, 2) field workers, 3) between individuals, and 4) within individuals. A concordance analysis was used to assess accuracy and precision, and a linear mixed model was used to estimate mean differences (bias) from blood specimens, anticoagulants, and to estimate the contribution of the 4 sources of error to [Hb] measurements. Positive mean [Hb] differences were found: 1.34 g/dL for capillary drops, 0.81 g/dL for pooled capillary blood samples, 0.756 g/dL for venous blood stored with EDTA, and 0.911 g/dL for venous blood stored with heparin. The mean [Hb] difference for venous blood with EDTA was used as a correction factor for all results measured using a HemoCue. After adjustment, capillary drops showed a mean difference of 0.585 g/dL, and pooled capillary samples were not significantly different. The individual variability was 95.8% of total variance, HemoCue devices contributed 2.1% of measurement error, field staff contributed 0.4%, and the residual was 1.7%. The HemoCue [Hb] measurement system is reliable in controlled environments, with a small measurement error of 4.2%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

OD works for USAID but acted in his personal capacity; the content of this article does not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental design for hemoglobin measurements.
Numbers are the order of procedures done to each participant.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Bland Altman and concordance plots of blood samples analyzed in HemoCue 201+* vs Cyanmethemoglobin method.
VREF: [Hb] measured in venous blood using cyanmethemoglobin in an Automated Hematology Analyzer; V201_EDTA: [Hb] measured in venous blood mixed with EDTA using HemoCue 201+; V201_heparin: [Hb] measured in venous blood mixed with heparin using HemoCue 201+; PC201: [Hb] measured in pooled capillary blood using HemoCue 201+; DC201: [Hb] measured in drops of capillary blood using HemoCue 201+.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hruschka D.J.; Williams A.M.; Mei Z.; Leidman E.; Suchdev P.S.; Young M.F.; et al.. Comparing Hemoglobin Distributions between Population-Based Surveys Matched by Country and Time. BMC Public Health 2020, doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08537-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stevens GA, Paciorek CJ, Flores-Urrutia MC, Borghi E, Namaste S, Wirth JP, et al.. National, Regional, and Global Estimates of Anaemia by Severity in Women and Children for 2000–19: A Pooled Analysis of Population-Representative Data. Lancet Glob Health. 2022. May;10(5):E627–E639. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00084-5 ; PMCID: PMC9023869. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rappaport A.I.; Karakochuk C.D.; Hess S.Y.; Whitehead R.D.; Namaste S.M.L.; Dary O.; et al.. Variability in Haemoglobin Concentration by Measurement Tool and Blood Source: An Analysis from Seven Countries. J Clin Pathol 2021, 74, doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206717 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Larson L.M.; Braat S.; Hasan M.I.; Mwangi M.N.; Estepa F.; Hossain S.J.; et al.. Preanalytic and Analytic Factors Affecting the Measurement of Haemoglobin Concentration: Impact on Global Estimates of Anaemia Prevalence. BMJ Glob Health 2021, 6, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005756 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Whitehead R.D.; Mei Z.; Mapango C.; Jefferds M.E.D. Methods and Analyzers for Hemoglobin Measurement in Clinical Laboratories and Field Settings. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2019. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14124 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources