Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):7763-7774.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002123.

Effect of a colorectal bundle in an entire healthcare region in Switzerland: results from a prospective cohort study (EvaCol study)

Affiliations
Observational Study

Effect of a colorectal bundle in an entire healthcare region in Switzerland: results from a prospective cohort study (EvaCol study)

Benjamin Wiesler et al. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Standardization has the potential to serve as a measure to mitigate complication rates. The objective was to assess the impact of standardization by implementing a colorectal bundle (CB), which comprises nine elements, on the complication rates in left-sided colorectal resections.

Patients and methods: This prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort trial was conducted in Switzerland at nine participating hospitals. During the control period, each patient was treated in accordance with the local standard protocol at their respective hospital. In the CB period, all patients were treated in accordance with the CB. The primary endpoint was the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) at 30 days.

Results: A total of 1141 patients were included (723 in the No CB group and 418 in the CB group). The median age was 66 years, and 50.6% were female. Median CCI before and after CB implementation was 0.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.0-20.9). A hurdle model approach was used for the analysis. The CB was not associated with the presence or severity of complications. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.03), surgery for malignancy (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.92), emergency surgery (OR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.31-3.41), elevated nutritional risk score (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24), and BMI (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.06) were associated with higher odds of postoperative complications. In a supplementary per-protocol analysis, for each additional item of the CB fulfilled, the odds of anastomotic leakage (AL) were 24% lower (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.93).

Conclusions: Dedicated teams can establish high-quality colorectal services in a network of hospitals with a joint standard. The study can serve as a model for other healthcare settings to conduct and implement quality improvement programs. The consistent implementation of the CB items can reduce the occurrence of AL.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CCI distribution probability density in No CB and CB group.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nomograms with risk factor contributions for complications, SSI and AL. To use the nomograms, locate the patient’s predictor values on the corresponding axes and draw a straight line upwards to obtain the associated points. Then, add the points for all predictors, locate the patient’s score on the total points axis, and draw a straight line downwards to obtain the corresponding probability.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bergvall M, Skullman S, Kodeda K, et al. . Better survival for patients with colon cancer operated on by specialized colorectal surgeons - a nationwide population-based study in Sweden 2007-2010. Colorectal Dis 2019;21:1379–1386. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alaa El-Hussuna, Sanjay Chaudri, Matteo Frasson, et al. . The 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) international snapshot audit of left colon, sigmoid and rectal resections - executive Summary. Colorectal Dis 2018;20(Suppl 6):13–14. - PubMed
    1. Gessler B, Eriksson O, Angenete E. Diagnosis, treatment, and consequences of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2017;32:549–556. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, et al. . Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection: results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 2017;266:870–877. - PubMed
    1. Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JL, et al. . Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:321–330. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding