Effect of a colorectal bundle in an entire healthcare region in Switzerland: results from a prospective cohort study (EvaCol study)
- PMID: 39453984
- PMCID: PMC11634084
- DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002123
Effect of a colorectal bundle in an entire healthcare region in Switzerland: results from a prospective cohort study (EvaCol study)
Abstract
Introduction: Standardization has the potential to serve as a measure to mitigate complication rates. The objective was to assess the impact of standardization by implementing a colorectal bundle (CB), which comprises nine elements, on the complication rates in left-sided colorectal resections.
Patients and methods: This prospective, multicentre, observational, cohort trial was conducted in Switzerland at nine participating hospitals. During the control period, each patient was treated in accordance with the local standard protocol at their respective hospital. In the CB period, all patients were treated in accordance with the CB. The primary endpoint was the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) at 30 days.
Results: A total of 1141 patients were included (723 in the No CB group and 418 in the CB group). The median age was 66 years, and 50.6% were female. Median CCI before and after CB implementation was 0.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.0-20.9). A hurdle model approach was used for the analysis. The CB was not associated with the presence or severity of complications. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.03), surgery for malignancy (OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.01-1.92), emergency surgery (OR 2.19, 95% CI: 1.31-3.41), elevated nutritional risk score (OR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.24), and BMI (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.06) were associated with higher odds of postoperative complications. In a supplementary per-protocol analysis, for each additional item of the CB fulfilled, the odds of anastomotic leakage (AL) were 24% lower (OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.93).
Conclusions: Dedicated teams can establish high-quality colorectal services in a network of hospitals with a joint standard. The study can serve as a model for other healthcare settings to conduct and implement quality improvement programs. The consistent implementation of the CB items can reduce the occurrence of AL.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Alaa El-Hussuna, Sanjay Chaudri, Matteo Frasson, et al. . The 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) international snapshot audit of left colon, sigmoid and rectal resections - executive Summary. Colorectal Dis 2018;20(Suppl 6):13–14. - PubMed
-
- Borstlap WAA, Westerduin E, Aukema TS, et al. . Anastomotic leakage and chronic presacral sinus formation after low anterior resection: results from a large cross-sectional study. Ann Surg 2017;266:870–877. - PubMed
-
- Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, Rodríguez JL, et al. . Risk factors for anastomotic leak after colon resection for cancer: multivariate analysis and nomogram from a multicentric, prospective, national study with 3193 patients. Ann Surg 2015;262:321–330. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
