Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Feb 1;45(2):257-268.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004309.

TRANSRETINAL PUNCTURE WITH A 41G CANNULA FOR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL SUBRETINAL FLUID IN FOVEA-OFF RETINAL DETACHMENTS TREATED BY VITRECTOMY VS FLUID TOLERANCE VS OTHER CONVENTIONAL DRAINAGE TECHNIQUES: A Comparative Study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

TRANSRETINAL PUNCTURE WITH A 41G CANNULA FOR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL SUBRETINAL FLUID IN FOVEA-OFF RETINAL DETACHMENTS TREATED BY VITRECTOMY VS FLUID TOLERANCE VS OTHER CONVENTIONAL DRAINAGE TECHNIQUES: A Comparative Study

Maxime Desira et al. Retina. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes between posterior drainage of residual fluid using a 41G cannula, fluid tolerance (residual subretinal fluid), and conventional complete drainage methods, including removal through peripheral retinal breaks, perfluorocarbon liquid, and posterior retinotomy.

Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we evaluated cases for visual acuity at 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included surgical success, postoperative metamorphopsia, shifts, full-thickness folds, optical coherence tomography parameters, and safety. Subgroup analyses were also conducted.

Results: Visual acuity did not differ significantly between the three main groups. Subgroup analyses revealed worse visual acuity for posterior retinotomy (20/270 in Snellen conversion, P = 0.002), with significantly more Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (40.0%, P = 0.003). Residual subretinal fluid tended to offer better secondary outcomes, without statistical significance except for postoperative epiretinal membrane (30.8%, P = 0.041). Subgroup analyses found significantly more shifts with PFCL (91.7%, P = 0.036). No cases of postoperative full-thickness folds or macular holes were observed with the 41G.

Conclusion: Our study introduced the 41G technique, indicating favorable outcomes for fovea-off retinal detachments. Nevertheless, fluid tolerance appeared to be the best option, offering a cost-effective and faster method, with an optimal microstructural profile and visual acuity comparable with that of complete drainage techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pandya VB, Ho IV, Hunyor AP. Does unintentional macular translocation after retinal detachment repair influence visual outcome?: Unintentional macular translocation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;40:88–92.
    1. Yamaguchi M, Ataka S, Shiraki K. Subretinal fluid drainage via original retinal breaks for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 2014;49:256–260.
    1. Zhou C, Lin Q, Chen F. Prevalence and predictors of metamorphopsia after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: a cross-sectional, comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;101:725–729.
    1. Vidne O, Blum Meirovitch S, Rabina G, et al. Perfluorocarbon liquid vs. subretinal fluid drainage during vitrectomy for the primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a comparative study. Curr Eye Res 2018;43:1389–1394.
    1. Pastor JC, Fernandez I, De La Rua ER, et al. Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project—report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:378–382.