TRANSRETINAL PUNCTURE WITH A 41G CANNULA FOR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL SUBRETINAL FLUID IN FOVEA-OFF RETINAL DETACHMENTS TREATED BY VITRECTOMY VS FLUID TOLERANCE VS OTHER CONVENTIONAL DRAINAGE TECHNIQUES: A Comparative Study
- PMID: 39454073
- DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004309
TRANSRETINAL PUNCTURE WITH A 41G CANNULA FOR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL SUBRETINAL FLUID IN FOVEA-OFF RETINAL DETACHMENTS TREATED BY VITRECTOMY VS FLUID TOLERANCE VS OTHER CONVENTIONAL DRAINAGE TECHNIQUES: A Comparative Study
Abstract
Purpose: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes between posterior drainage of residual fluid using a 41G cannula, fluid tolerance (residual subretinal fluid), and conventional complete drainage methods, including removal through peripheral retinal breaks, perfluorocarbon liquid, and posterior retinotomy.
Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we evaluated cases for visual acuity at 3 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included surgical success, postoperative metamorphopsia, shifts, full-thickness folds, optical coherence tomography parameters, and safety. Subgroup analyses were also conducted.
Results: Visual acuity did not differ significantly between the three main groups. Subgroup analyses revealed worse visual acuity for posterior retinotomy (20/270 in Snellen conversion, P = 0.002), with significantly more Grade C proliferative vitreoretinopathy (40.0%, P = 0.003). Residual subretinal fluid tended to offer better secondary outcomes, without statistical significance except for postoperative epiretinal membrane (30.8%, P = 0.041). Subgroup analyses found significantly more shifts with PFCL (91.7%, P = 0.036). No cases of postoperative full-thickness folds or macular holes were observed with the 41G.
Conclusion: Our study introduced the 41G technique, indicating favorable outcomes for fovea-off retinal detachments. Nevertheless, fluid tolerance appeared to be the best option, offering a cost-effective and faster method, with an optimal microstructural profile and visual acuity comparable with that of complete drainage techniques.
References
-
- Pandya VB, Ho IV, Hunyor AP. Does unintentional macular translocation after retinal detachment repair influence visual outcome?: Unintentional macular translocation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;40:88–92.
-
- Yamaguchi M, Ataka S, Shiraki K. Subretinal fluid drainage via original retinal breaks for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 2014;49:256–260.
-
- Zhou C, Lin Q, Chen F. Prevalence and predictors of metamorphopsia after successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: a cross-sectional, comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;101:725–729.
-
- Vidne O, Blum Meirovitch S, Rabina G, et al. Perfluorocarbon liquid vs. subretinal fluid drainage during vitrectomy for the primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a comparative study. Curr Eye Res 2018;43:1389–1394.
-
- Pastor JC, Fernandez I, De La Rua ER, et al. Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Project—report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:378–382.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
