Detecting Leptospira spp. infection in cows by PCR: What is the best sample to test?
- PMID: 39454480
- DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2024.10.020
Detecting Leptospira spp. infection in cows by PCR: What is the best sample to test?
Abstract
Bovine leptospirosis is a major reproductive disease. As cows can be leptospiral carriers both on the renal and genital tract, diagnosis can be challenging, with an underlying risk of misdiagnosis. Traditionally, the infection has been diagnosed by culturing or PCR from urine samples. Nevertheless, recent studies have suggested testing genital samples rather than urine, particularly for the diagnosis of genital colonization and reproductive disorders. The present study aimed to compare urine versus genital samples to detect leptospiral carriers in naturally infected cows with poor reproductive performance under field conditions. Five herds presenting >20 % of seroreactive animals against the Sejroe serogroup were selected. Of these, 106 cows with poor reproductive performance were studied, and urine, uterine fragment (UF), and cervicovaginal mucus (CVM) were obtained and tested by lipL32-PCR. A total of 73 (68.9 %) cows were infected; 64 of which (87.7 %) were diagnosed via positive genital samples (UF and/or CVM), while only 14 (19.2 %) by urine (p ≤ 0.001). Therefore, if the study had been limited to urine samples, as largely recommended, less than 20 % of the infected cows would have been detected, representing a huge misdiagnosis of the disease that could undermine the efficacy of control programs. In this context, the present study reinforces prior findings that testing genital samples, particularly CVM, is crucial to effectively diagnosing infected subfertile cows.
Keywords: Bovine; Cervicovaginal mucus; Leptospirosis; PCR; Uterus; lipL32.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Leptospira spp. strains associated with Bovine Genital Leptospirosis (BGL).Microb Pathog. 2022 Dec;173(Pt A):105841. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105841. Epub 2022 Oct 27. Microb Pathog. 2022. PMID: 36309182
-
Field application of a combined serological-molecular testing protocol for diagnosing genital leptospirosis in naturally infected cows with gestational losses.Vet Rec. 2023 Nov 18;193(10):e3309. doi: 10.1002/vetr.3309. Epub 2023 Sep 12. Vet Rec. 2023. PMID: 37700460
-
Bovine Genital Leptospirosis and reproductive disorders of live subfertile cows under field conditions.Vet Microbiol. 2021 Oct;261:109213. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109213. Epub 2021 Aug 23. Vet Microbiol. 2021. PMID: 34481272
-
Equine genital leptospirosis: Evidence of an important silent chronic reproductive syndrome.Theriogenology. 2022 Oct 15;192:81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.08.029. Epub 2022 Aug 28. Theriogenology. 2022. PMID: 36063673 Review.
-
Diagnosis of fetal loss caused by bovine viral diarrhea virus and Leptospira spp.Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2005 Jul;21(2):463-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2005.02.010. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2005. PMID: 15955440 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
How Is Bovine Genital Leptospirosis Diagnosed Under Field Conditions?Animals (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;15(3):443. doi: 10.3390/ani15030443. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39943213 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous