Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 1;36(4):645-656.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000534. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in IgA Nephropathy: A Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Collaborators, Affiliations

Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in IgA Nephropathy: A Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Richard Lafayette et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Key Points:

  1. This phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated the complement C5 inhibitor, ravulizumab, in adults with IgA nephropathy.

  2. A 30.1% (90% confidence interval, 13.7% to 43.5%) relative reduction in proteinuria for ravulizumab versus placebo was observed at approximately 6 months.

  3. Treatment with ravulizumab was well tolerated.

Background: The complement system plays a central role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. We present findings from a phase 2 trial of ravulizumab, a complement C5 inhibitor.

Methods: The Study of Ravulizumab in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis or IgA Nephropathy (NCT04564339) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ravulizumab in addition to standard of care. Adults with IgA nephropathy, proteinuria ≥1 g/d, and eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and on stable renin-angiotensin blockade were randomized 2:1 to ravulizumab (intravenous every 8 weeks) or placebo for 26 weeks. From week 26–50, all participants received open-label ravulizumab. The primary end point was percentage change in proteinuria from baseline to week 26. Secondary end points included change in proteinuria at week 50 and eGFR. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated.

Results: Forty-three patients were randomized to ravulizumab and 23 to placebo. At week 26, a statistically significant reduction in proteinuria was observed with ravulizumab versus placebo: −41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], −50.2% to −32.0%) change in urine protein with ravulizumab and −16.8% (95% CI, −31.8% to 1.6%) change with placebo (30.1% treatment effect; P = 0.005). At week 50, there was a −44.8% (95% CI, −55.1% to −32.1%) change from baseline in urine protein with ravulizumab, and in patients who crossed over from placebo to ravulizumab at week 26, the change from baseline (week 0) to week 50 was −45.1% (−58.0% to −28.4%). The least squares mean change in eGFR from baseline to week 26 with ravulizumab was 0.2 (95% CI, −2.3 to 2.7) ml/min per 1.73 m2 and with placebo was −4.5 (−7.9 to −1.1) ml/min per 1.73 m2. From baseline to week 50, the least squares mean change in eGFR with ravulizumab was −3.9 (95% CI, −6.4 to−1.3) ml/min per 1.73 m2, and in patients who crossed over from placebo to ravulizumab at week 26, it was −6.3 (−9.7 to −2.9) ml/min per 1.73 m2. Ravulizumab was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that for placebo.

Conclusions: An early, sustained, and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria and trend toward stabilization of eGFR were observed with ravulizumab versus placebo. A phase 3 trial (NCT06291376) is enrolling.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number:: Study of Ravulizumab in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis or IgA Nephropathy, NCT04564339.

Podcast: This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2024_10_26_KTS_October2024.mp3

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure forms, as provided by each author, are available with the online version of the article at http://links.lww.com/JSN/E905.

References

    1. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Glomerular Diseases Work Group. KDIGO 2021 clinical practice guideline for the management of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int. 2021;100(4S):S1–S276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong K Pitcher D Braddon F, et al. Effects of rare kidney diseases on kidney failure: a longitudinal analysis of the UK National Registry of Rare Kidney Diseases (RaDaR) cohort. Lancet. 2024;403(10433):1279–1289. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02843-x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moriyama T Tanaka K Iwasaki C, et al. Prognosis in IgA nephropathy: 30-year analysis of 1,012 patients at a single center in Japan. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091756 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jarrick S Lundberg S Welander A, et al. Mortality in IgA nephropathy: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(5):866–876. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018101017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hastings MC Bursac Z Julian BA, et al. Life expectancy for patients from the Southeastern United States with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int Rep. 2018;3(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.08.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources