The impact of root end filling material type and the application of bone graft on healing of periapical tissues after endodontic microsurgery (a clinical randomized controlled trial)
- PMID: 39455597
- PMCID: PMC11511815
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66033-w
The impact of root end filling material type and the application of bone graft on healing of periapical tissues after endodontic microsurgery (a clinical randomized controlled trial)
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of combining different bioactive root-end filling materials with composite bone graft (xenogeneic mixed with autogenous bone fragments) on the healing process of periapical tissues after endodontic micro-surgery procedure. In this triple-blinded clinical trial, 56 patients were divided into 2 main groups (28 each) according to the root-end filling material and 2 subgroups according to the presence or absence of the composite bone graft material. Group I: MTA root-end filling (n = 28) in which there are Sub-group A: without bone graft (n = 14) and Sub-group B: with composite bone graft (n = 14). Group II: TotalFill root-end filling (n = 28) in which there are Sub-group A: without bone graft (n = 14) and Sub-group B: with composite bone graft (n = 14). Healthy patients whose ages range from 20 to 50 years with small-to-medium size radiolucency in CBCT related to single-rooted maxillary teeth were included in this study. Patients were assigned a number starting from 1 to 56 and were randomly allocated to four test groups (2 main groups and 2 sub-groups) following simple randomization procedure guidelines described by IBM SPSS V23 (IBM USA) statistical analysis software. This trial was triple-blind where the patient, the outcome assessors, and the main operator were blinded to the applied intervention. Every patient was evaluated clinically and by CBCT at two main observation periods: presurgical and 12-month post-operative. They were also examined and evaluated clinically and radiographically through periapical x-rays after one week, three, and six months. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Of the 56 patients enrolled in the study, 49 patients were available for the final analysis. All groups showed no statistically significant differences with regard to healing or success rates at the 12-month follow-up mark. No adverse effects were encountered. Results showed that high success rates were achieved using MTA and TotalFill in the healing of periapical lesions after endodontic surgery. The addition of bone graft in small-to-medium size lesions did not affect the success rate of endodontic surgeries.
Keywords: Apical lesions; Apicoectomy; Bone graft; Endodontic surgery; MTA; TotalFill.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The outcome of combined use of iRoot BP Plus and iRoot SP for root-end filling in endodontic microsurgery: a randomized controlled trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 2;28(3):188. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05569-7. Clin Oral Investig. 2024. PMID: 38430316 Clinical Trial.
-
Periapical bone regeneration after endodontic microsurgery with three different root-end filling materials: amalgam, SuperEBA, and mineral trioxide aggregate.J Endod. 2010 Aug;36(8):1323-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.04.008. Epub 2010 Jun 14. J Endod. 2010. PMID: 20647089
-
A Randomized Controlled Study of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Super Ethoxybenzoic Acid as Root-end Filling Materials in Endodontic Microsurgery: Long-term Outcomes.J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 May 20. J Endod. 2016. PMID: 27215809 Clinical Trial.
-
Outcome of Endodontic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of the Literature-Part 3: Comparison of Endodontic Microsurgical Techniques with 2 Different Root-end Filling Materials.J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Apr 19. J Endod. 2018. PMID: 29681480 Review.
-
Optimizing Endodontic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Guided Tissue Regeneration, Grafting, and Platelet Concentrates vs. No Intervention.Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;13(3):91. doi: 10.3390/dj13030091. Dent J (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40136719 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Washout Resistance of Bioactive Root-End Filling Materials-A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 3;14(7):2446. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072446. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40217897 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Siqueira, J. F. Endodontic infections: Concepts, paradigms, and perspectives. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol.94, 281–293 (2002). - PubMed
-
- Johnsen, I., Bårdsen, A. & Haug, S. R. Impact of case difficulty, endodontic mishaps, and instrumentation method on endodontic treatment outcome and quality of life: A four-year follow-up study. J. Endodont.10.1016/j.joen.2023.01.005 (2023). - PubMed
-
- Arias, A., De La Macorra, J. C., Azabal, M., Hidalgo, J. J. & Peters, O. A. Prospective case controlled clinical study of post-endodontic pain after rotary root canal preparation performed by a single operator. J. Dent.43, 389–395 (2015). - PubMed
-
- Kim, S. & Kratchman, S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: A review. J. Endod.32, 601–623 (2006). - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical