Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Sep 26;13(10):1172.
doi: 10.3390/antiox13101172.

Modulatory Impact of Oxidative Stress on Action Potentials in Pathophysiological States: A Comprehensive Review

Affiliations
Review

Modulatory Impact of Oxidative Stress on Action Potentials in Pathophysiological States: A Comprehensive Review

Chitaranjan Mahapatra et al. Antioxidants (Basel). .

Abstract

Oxidative stress, characterized by an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the body's antioxidant defenses, significantly affects cellular function and viability. It plays a pivotal role in modulating membrane potentials, particularly action potentials (APs), essential for properly functioning excitable cells such as neurons, smooth muscles, pancreatic beta cells, and myocytes. The interaction between oxidative stress and AP dynamics is crucial for understanding the pathophysiology of various conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases, cardiac arrhythmias, and ischemia-reperfusion injuries. This review explores how oxidative stress influences APs, focusing on alterations in ion channel biophysics, gap junction, calcium dynamics, mitochondria, and Interstitial Cells of Cajal functions. By integrating current research, we aim to elucidate how oxidative stress contributes to disease progression and discuss potential therapeutic interventions targeting this interaction.

Keywords: APs; biophysics; ion channel; oxidative stress; pathophysiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the processes by which oxidative stress disrupts normal cells through the induction of reactive oxygen species. The red positive signs indicate ROS enhancers, while the red negative signs indicate ROS inhibitors. Oxidative stress radicals that modulate the shape of the cell are depicted by red stars and circles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Illustration of the simulated membrane depolarization (black solid line), AP (red solid line), depolarization phase, repolarization phase, threshold potential (star mark), and resting membrane potential, which is maintained at −52 mV. (bd) show simulated cardiac AP, slow wave with a burst, and series of neuronal Aps, respectively. The X-axis represents unscaled time, while the Y-axis represents unscaled membrane potential.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) shows how connexins from Cell 1 and Cell 2 form a gap junction, enabling signal transfer between them, as indicated by the red bidirectional arrow. (b) depicts six cells connected in a linear arrangement through gap junctions (red arrow), illustrating signal transmission along this network. (c) is a schematic of the gap junction between Cell 1 and Cell 2, where V1 and V2 represent their membrane potentials, and rj indicates the gap junction resistance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A schematic representation of the ICC cell among smooth muscle cells (SM cells). An ICC cell consists of several ion channels and is connected to neighboring cells via a gap junction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Illustrates Ca2+ dynamics processes with all cellular and sub-cellular compartments described in the previous paragraph.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Illustrates protein-mediating ion fluxes in the outer mitochondria membrane described in the previous paragraph. The putative channel acetylcholine receptor is also illustrated.
Figure 7
Figure 7
A schematic diagram of the representation of the redox modulation on membrane potential via several pathways that can modulate the AP parameter and cellular excitability.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Veschetti L., Treccani M., De Tomi E., Malerba G. Genomic Instability Evolutionary Footprints on Human Health: Driving Forces or Side Effects? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:11437. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411437. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Salmaninejad A., Ilkhani K., Marzban H., Navashenaq J.G., Rahimirad S., Radnia F., Yousefi M., Bahmanpour Z., Azhdari S., Sahebkar A. Genomic instability in cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potentials. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021;27:3161–3169. doi: 10.2174/1381612827666210426100206. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Petrov D., Daura X., Zagrovic B. Effect of oxidative damage on the stability and dimerization of superoxide dismutase 1. Biophys. J. 2016;110:1499–1509. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Merlo D., Mollinari C., Racaniello M., Garaci E., Cardinale A. DNA double strand breaks: A common theme in neurodegenerative diseases. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2016;13:1208–1218. doi: 10.2174/1567205013666160401114915. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dziąbowska-Grabias K., Sztanke M., Zając P., Celejewski M., Kurek K., Szkutnicki S., Korga P., Bulikowski W., Sztanke K. Antioxidant therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Antioxidants. 2021;10:412. doi: 10.3390/antiox10030412. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources