Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 14;25(20):11028.
doi: 10.3390/ijms252011028.

Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR), Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15), and Soluble C5b-9 (sC5b-9) Levels Are Significantly Associated with Endothelial Injury Indices in CAR-T Cell Recipients

Affiliations

Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR), Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15), and Soluble C5b-9 (sC5b-9) Levels Are Significantly Associated with Endothelial Injury Indices in CAR-T Cell Recipients

Eleni Gavriilaki et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Endothelial injury indices, such as Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX), modified EASIX (m-EASIX), and simplified EASIX (s-EASIX) scores, have been previously associated with chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapy complications. Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), and soluble C5b-9 (sC5b-9) have been described as markers of endothelial injury post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the current study, we examined whether suPAR, GDF-15, and sC5b-9 levels were associated with endothelial injury indices in adult CAR-T cell recipients. The levels of these markers were measured in patients before CAR-T cell infusion and in healthy individuals with immunoenzymatic methods. We studied 45 CAR-T cell recipients and 20 healthy individuals as the control group. SuPAR, GDF-15, and sC5b-9 levels were significantly higher in the patients' group compared to the healthy control group (p < 0.001, in all comparisons). SuPAR levels at baseline were associated with the m-EASIX scores calculated at the same time point (p = 0.020), while suPAR and GDF-15 concentrations were correlated with EASIX scores at day 14 post-infusion (p < 0.001 in both comparisons). Moreover, sC5b-9 levels were correlated with the s-EASIX scores at infusion (p = 0.008) and the EASIX scores at day 14 (p = 0.005). In our study, sC5b9, suPAR, and GDF-15 levels were found to reflect endothelial injury in CAR-T cell recipients.

Keywords: chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T); complement; cytokine release syndrome (CRS); endothelial activation and stress index (EASIX); endothelial dysfunction; growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15); immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS); soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.G. has received honoraria or research funding from Astra Zeneca, Gilead, Jazz, Omeros, Sanofi, and Sobi. These companies had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. The remaining authors had no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) sC5b9 levels show a significant correlation with sEASIX0 (p = 0.008) and (B) EASIX14 (p = 0.005) scores. sC5b9 = soluble C5b-9 and s-EASIX0 = simplified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index scores were calculated at the day of CAR-T cell infusion; EASIXDAY14 = Endothelial Activation and Stress Index scores were calculated 14 days post-CAR-T cell infusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) s-EASIX0 score over the median value (1.9, range: 0.74–49.3) was associated with poor OS (p = 0.027); (B) s-EASIX14 score over the median value (3, range: 0.6–74.6) was also associated with poor OS (p = 0.004). Green lines: s-EASIX score below the median; blue lines: s-EASIX score over the median value. S-EASIX0 = simplified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index calculated at the day of the infusion; S-EASIX14 = simplified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index calculated 14 days post-infusion; OS = overall survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Methodology used in our study. Samples for sC5b-9, suPAR, and GDF-15 measurements were obtained from CAR-T cell recipients before their admission to the cellular therapy unit, and at the same time point, EASIX, mEASIX, and s-EASIX scores were calculated. EASIX and s-EASIX scores were also calculated on the day of CAR-T cell product infusion and 14 days post-infusion. During the post-infusion period, patients were closely monitored for therapy-related toxicities. The minimum follow-up period was 1 month. LDC = lymphodepleting chemotherapy; EASIX = Endothelial Activation and Stress Index; m-EASIX = modified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index; s-EASIX = simplified Endothelial Activation and Stress Index; sC5b-9 = soluble C5b-9; suPAR = soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor; GDF-15 = growth differentiation factor-15; CRS = cytokine release syndrome; ICANS = immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sterner R.C., Sterner R.M. CAR-T Cell Therapy: Current Limitations and Potential Strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11:69. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00459-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Y.-J., Abila B., Mostafa Kamel Y. CAR-T: What Is Next? Cancers. 2023;15:663. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030663. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheykhhasan M., Ahmadieh-Yazdi A., Vicidomini R., Poondla N., Tanzadehpanah H., Dirbaziyan A., Mahaki H., Manoochehri H., Kalhor N., Dama P. CAR T Therapies in Multiple Myeloma: Unleashing the Future. Cancer Gene Ther. 2024;31:667–686. doi: 10.1038/s41417-024-00750-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee D.W., Santomasso B.D., Locke F.L., Ghobadi A., Turtle C.J., Brudno J.N., Maus M.V., Park J.H., Mead E., Pavletic S., et al. ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rejeski K., Subklewe M., Aljurf M., Bachy E., Balduzzi A., Barba P., Bruno B., Benjamin R., Carrabba M.G., Chabannon C., et al. Immune Effector Cell–Associated Hematotoxicity: EHA/EBMT Consensus Grading and Best Practice Recommendations. Blood. 2023;142:865–877. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023020578. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources