Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 17;14(10):960.
doi: 10.3390/bs14100960.

Start Task Crafting, Stay Away from Cyberloafing: The Moderating Role of Supervisor Developmental Feedback

Affiliations

Start Task Crafting, Stay Away from Cyberloafing: The Moderating Role of Supervisor Developmental Feedback

Man Hai et al. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Cyberloafing as a production deviance behavior raises organizational concerns. Unfortunately, it is unknown how to minimize cyberloafing from a bottom-up perspective, particularly different types of cyberloafing. This study draws on the job crafting and dual-process theory to construct a framework for understanding the relationship between task crafting and passive-active cyberloafing, as well as their boundary condition (i.e., supervisor developmental feedback). We adopted a convenient sampling method, following a two-stage sampling with a time interval of 2 weeks. A sample of 614 full-time employed adults were recruited from the online survey. The results showed that: (1) Task crafting was negatively related to passive and active cyberloafing, respectively. (2) The impact of task crafting on passive cyberloafing rather than active cyberloafing was moderated by supervisor developmental feedback, such that task crafting had significant negative relations with passive cyberloafing when supervisor developmental feedback was higher (vs. lower). Overall, our research findings indicate that passive cyberloafing seems more sensitive to the organizational environment than active cyberloafing, thus different types of cyberloafing have different intervention strategies.

Keywords: active cyberloafing; passive cyberloafing; supervisor developmental feedback; task crafting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hypothesized model of relationships among task crafting, developmental feedback, passive and active cyberloafing.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unstandardized structural path coefficients and standard errors (in parentheses) for the structural equation model. Dashed arrows indicate non-significant effects. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The moderating effect of supervisor development feedback on the relationship between task crafting and passive cyberloafing.

Similar articles

References

    1. Camerini A.-L., Morlino S., Marciano L. Boredom and digital media use: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2023;11:100313. doi: 10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100313. - DOI
    1. Pindek S., Krajcevska A., Spector P.E. Cyberloafing as a coping mechanism: Dealing with workplace boredom. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;86:147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.040. - DOI
    1. Lim V.K.G. The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. J. Organ. Behav. 2002;23:675–694. doi: 10.1002/job.161. - DOI
    1. Salary.com How and Why Your Employees Are Wasting Time at Work? [(accessed on 8 May 2020)]. Available online: https://www.salary.com/articles/why-how-your-employees-are-wasting-time-...
    1. Askew K., Buckner J.E., Taing M.U., Ilie A., Bauer J.A., Coovert M.D. Explaining cyberloafing: The role of the theory of planned behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2014;36:510–519. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.006. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources