Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6038.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13206038.

Quantified Deltoid Muscle Stiffness Can Predict Improved Muscle Strength for Elevation Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Affiliations

Quantified Deltoid Muscle Stiffness Can Predict Improved Muscle Strength for Elevation Following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Taku Hatta et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Objective: Although the indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are expanding, an improvement in muscle strength in each patient following RSA remains unclear. The objective was to investigate whether or not improvement in muscle strength for shoulder elevation in patients who underwent RSA was influenced by pre- or postoperative deltoid muscle stiffness measured using shear wave elastography (SWE). Methods: Sixty-five patients who underwent RSA over a 12-month follow-up period were included. Patient characteristics and clinical and radiologic measurements were recorded. Preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery, deltoid muscle stiffness and muscle strength for scapular-plane abduction were sequentially measured using SWE and a portable dynamometer. In each quarterly period (3-6, 6-9, and 9-12 months), patients were assessed for an improvement in muscle strength and separated into two groups: improved and non-improved. To assess the risk of lack of improvement in each quarterly period, the variables were compared between the groups. Results: Improvement in muscle strength was observed in 52 patients (80%) at 3-6 months, 46 patients (71%) at 6-9 months, and 39 patients (60%) at 9-12 months. Notably, SWE measurements at the beginning of each period showed significantly greater values in the non-improved group than in the improved group during the subsequent quarterly period. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis suggested that SWE values >45.1-50.0 kPa might be associated with a lack of muscle strength improvement over 3 months with 73-87% specificity and 73-85% sensitivity. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that increased deltoid muscle stiffness negatively correlated with an improvement in muscle strength following RSA. According to our results, a postoperative assessment with SWE may be useful for not only improving muscle strength after RSA but also facilitating postoperative improvement by preventing excessive stiffness in the deltoid muscle.

Keywords: deltoid muscle stiffness; muscle strength; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; shear wave elastography; shoulder elevation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Positioning of the ultrasound probe during shear wave elastography (SWE) measurement for the deltoid muscle and an ultrasonographic image for the current assessment. SWE was examined percutaneously, and muscle stiffness values were obtained from five segments: anterior (A1, A2), middle (M), and posterior (P1, P2). The yellow dotted circle represents the region of interest for measuring muscle stiffness.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the cut-off SWE values leading to a lack of improvement in muscle strength for elevation (MSE). The figures represent the SWE measurements at the beginning of the postoperative period when an MSE improvement was expected during the subsequent 3-month period: at 3 months for 3–6 months (a), at 6 months for 6–9 months (b) and at 9 months for 9–12 months (c).

Similar articles

References

    1. Park J.S., Lee H.J., Jo Y.H., Lee M.K., Lee B.G. Surgical Trends of Shoulder Arthroplasty: Nationwide Epidemiologic Study in South Korea. Clin. Orthop. Surg. 2023;15:290–299. doi: 10.4055/cios22163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muller A.M., Born M., Jung C., Flury M., Kolling C., Schwyzer H.K., Audige L. Glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Is larger better for external rotation and abduction strength? J. Shoulder Elb. Surg. 2018;27:44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rienmuller A., Maffiuletti N.A., Schwyzer H.K., Eggspuhler A. Shoulder Muscle Strength and Neuromuscular Activation 2 Years after Reverse Shoulder Prosthesis—An Experimental Case Control Study. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:365. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020365. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almeida A., Junior A.D., Pante S., Gobbi L.F., Vicente M.G., Oliboni A.B., Agostini A.P. Strength Assessment after Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Arthroplast. 2023;7:24715492231167111. doi: 10.1177/24715492231167111. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hatta T., Giambini H., Uehara K., Okamoto S., Chen S., Sperling J.W., Itoi E., An K.N. Quantitative assessment of rotator cuff muscle elasticity: Reliability and feasibility of shear wave elastography. J. Biomech. 2015;48:3853–3858. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources