Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 28;12(10):1967.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12101967.

A Comparison of Growth Performance, Blood Parameters, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community of Tibetan Sheep When Fattened by Pasture Grazing versus Stall Feeding

Affiliations

A Comparison of Growth Performance, Blood Parameters, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community of Tibetan Sheep When Fattened by Pasture Grazing versus Stall Feeding

Huiying Ji et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Traditionally, Tibetan sheep only graze pastures without any supplementary feed. However, in recent years, feedlots are being used for fattening Tibetan sheep. The present study compared the growth rates, blood parameters, rumen fermentation, and bacterial communities in Tibetan sheep fattened by pasture grazing (PG) versus those fattened by stall feeding (SF). Twenty 18-month-old Tibetan sheep wethers (42.6 ± 2.11 kg) were divided randomly into PG (n = 10) and SF (n = 10) groups. The PG sheep grazed the grasslands without any supplementary feed, while the SF sheep were offered a commercial total mixed ration (TMR) at a crude protein content of 16.2% DM and an ME of 10.59 MJ/kg. The sheep were on their treatments for 70 days, which included 10 days for adaptation and 60 days for measurements. The average daily gain, white blood cell and lymphocyte counts were greater (p < 0.05), while the platelet count was lower (p < 0.05) in the SF group than in the PG group. The serum glutathione peroxidase activity, and concentrations of total proteins and albumin were greater (p < 0.05), while glucose was lower (p < 0.01) in the PG group compared to the SF group. The concentrations of ruminal ammonia-N and total volatile fatty acids (VFAs) were greater (p < 0.05), while the pH was lower (p < 0.05) in the SF group compared to the PG group. The molar proportion of acetate and the ratio of acetate to propionate were greater (p < 0.01) in the PG sheep than in the SF sheep, but the molar proportion of propionate and iso-VFAs did not differ (p > 0.05) between the groups. Based on the PCoA, the ruminal bacterial communities were distinct between groups, and the alpha diversity was greater (p < 0.001) in the PG sheep than in the SF sheep. The dominant phyla of the rumen bacteria were Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, while the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio was greater (p < 0.001) in the SF group than in the PG group. At the genus level, the relative abundance of Ruminococcus was greater (p < 0.05) in the SF group, while the abundances of Prevotella, the Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Butyrivibrio, and unclassified_f_Lachnospiraceae were greater (p < 0.05) in the PG group. It was concluded that the Tibetan sheep adopted a short-term intensive fattening strategy when stall fed which altered the rumen bacterial community and blood parameters, enhanced rumen fermentation, and, ultimately, improved their average daily gain.

Keywords: Tibetan sheep; blood parameters; fattening strategies; rumen bacterial community; rumen fermentation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of different fattening strategies on α and β diversity of the ruminal bacterial community in Tibetan sheep. (A) Venn graph of OUTs; (B) PCoA of the rumen bacteria; (C) Ace index; (D) Chao index; (E) Shannon index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rumen bacteria classification at phylum level in Tibetan sheep under different fattening strategies. (A) Relative abundance; (B) Differential rumen bacterial species.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rumen bacteria classification at genus level in Tibetan sheep under different fattening strategies. (A) Relative abundance; (B) Differential rumen bacterial species.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) for rumen microbiota in Tibetan sheep with different fattening strategies. (A) Linear discriminant analysis. (B) Cladogram. Prefixes represent abbreviations for the taxonomic rank of each taxon, phylum (p_), class (c_), order (o_), family (f_), and genus (g_).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Spearman’s rank correlation analysis between the bacteria at the genus level and rumen fermentation parameters. * p < 0.05, and ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.001 according to the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhou J.W., Mi J.D., Titgemeyer E.C., Guo X.S., Ding L.M., Wang H.C., Qiu Q., Li Z.P., Long R.J. A comparison of nitrogen utilization and urea metabolism between Tibetan and fine-wool sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 2015;93:3006–3030. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8865. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou J.W., Jing X.P., Degen A.A., Liu H., Zhang Z., Yang G. Effect of level of oat hay intake on apparent digestibility, rumen fermentation and urinary purine derivatives in Tibetan and fine-wool sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018;241:112–120. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.023. - DOI
    1. Jing X.P., Wang W.J., Degen A.A., Wang W., Guo Y., Kang J., Liu P., Ding L., Shang Z., Qiu Q., et al. Comparison between Tibetan and Small-tailed Han sheep in adipocyte phenotype, lipid metabolism and energy homoeostasis regulation of adipose tissues when consuming diets of different energy levels. Br. J. Nutr. 2020;124:668–680. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520001701. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou J.W., Wang W.J., Jing X.P., Guo Y., Kang J., Shang Z., Yu Z., Qiu Q., Guo X., Ding L., et al. Effect of dietary energy on digestibilities, rumen fermentation, urinary purine derivatives and serum metabolites in Tibetan and small-tailed Han sheep. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2019;103:977–987. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13098. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Feeding Standard of Meat-Producing Sheep and Goats in China. China Agricultural Press Beijing; Beijing, China: 2004.

LinkOut - more resources