Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 11;13(20):2853.
doi: 10.3390/plants13202853.

Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Alfalfa Using DNA Polymorphism Analysis and Statistical Tools

Affiliations

Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Alfalfa Using DNA Polymorphism Analysis and Statistical Tools

Cerasela Petolescu et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

The cultivation of alfalfa is crucial for farmers as it is an excellent forage crop with a high nitrogen-fixing capacity, making it indispensable in crop rotations. Breeding programs face challenges in advancing more rapidly in genetic diversity to achieve a higher heterosis effect and, consequently, greater yield. In this study, we used 30 alfalfa varieties, which were used for molecular analyses by 5 ISSR primers and 13 RAPD primers. The results obtained highlighted the greater efficiency of ISSR primers in identifying genetic diversity. On the other hand, the simultaneous use of ISSR + RAPD allowed for clearer clustering of varieties that enabled more efficiently distinguishing the genetic diversity. The most efficient ISSR primer, A17, generated 31 polymorphic bands, while the most efficient RAPD primer, L-07, generated only 21 bands. Varieties such as "Pastoral" and "F1413-02" exhibited low similarity coefficients (0.39), suggesting their potential for enhancing genetic variability through crossbreeding, thereby increasing the potential of achieving a greater heterosis effect. Conversely, varieties with high similarity coefficients, such as "Cristal" and "Viking" (0.81) are less suited for this purpose. The correlation between specific markers highlights that using both ISSR and RAPD markers together offers a clear understanding of genetic diversity in alfalfa, aiding in more effective selection for crossbreeding in breeding programs.

Keywords: ISSR primers; RAPD markers; alfalfa; genetic diversity; molecular breeding strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Analysis of agarose gel electrophoresis using A-17 primer: MM—Molecular Marker, 1—Satelit, 2—F1109—99, 3—F105—90, 4—Granat, 5—Cosmina, 6—Sigma, 7—F1615—04, 8—F1206—00, 9—F1306—01, 10—F1822—06, 11—Super, 12—F270—91, 13—F1413—02, 14—F1310—01, 15—F1111—99, 16—Pastoral, 17—Magnat, 18—Alina, 19—Selena, 20—Stolo—13, 21—Mf 42—96, 22—Viking, 23—Cristal, 24—F21991, 25—Coral, 26—Dorina, 27—Saturn, 28—Opal, 29—Venus, 30—F907—97.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation similarity coefficients values between ISSR primers concerning the genetic similarity of alfalfa genotypes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Analysis of agarose gel electrophoresis using L-07 primer: MM—Molecular Marker, 1—Satelit, 2—F1109—99, 3—F105—90, 4—Granat, 5—Cosmina, 6—Sigma, 7—F1615—04, 8—F1206—00, 9—F1306—01, 10—F1822—06, 11—Super, 12—F270—91, 13—F1413—02, 14—F1310—01, 15—F1111—99, 16—Pastoral, 17—Magnat, 18—Alina, 19—Selena, 20—Stolo—13, 21—Mf 42—96, 22—Viking, 23—Cristal, 24—F21991, 25—Coral, 26—Dorina, 27—Saturn, 28—Opal, 29—Venus, 30—F907—97.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation coefficients values between RAPD primers concerning the genetic similarity of alfalfa genotypes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Jaccard similarity heatmap of alfalfa genotypes analyzed with ISSR and RAPD primers.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Hierarchical clustering dendrogram with bootstrap values: (A) ISSR results, (B) RAPD results, (C) combined ISSR and RAPD analysis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparative clustering of varieties using hierarchical and K-means methods based on ISSR and RAPD markers: (A) ISSR results, (B) RAPD results, (C) combined ISSR and RAPD analysis.

References

    1. Li X., Brummer E.C. Applied Genetics and Genomics in Alfalfa Breeding. Agronomy. 2012;2:40–61. doi: 10.3390/agronomy2010040. - DOI
    1. Fabek Uher S., Radman S., Opačić N., Dujmović M., Benko B., Lagundžija D., Mijić V., Prša L., Babac S., Šic Žlabur J. Alfalfa, Cabbage, Beet and Fennel Microgreens in Floating Hydroponics—Perspective Nutritious Food? Plants. 2023;12:2098. doi: 10.3390/plants12112098. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kulkarni K.P., Tayade R., Asekova S., Song J.T., Shannon J.G., Lee J.-D. Harnessing the Potential of Forage Legumes, Alfalfa, Soybean, and Cowpea for Sustainable Agriculture and Global Food Security. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:1314. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01314. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grabber J.H., Dias J.L.C.S., Renz M.J. Establishment of Alfalfa Intercropped under Corn in Response to Varying Rates of Prohexadione with or without Fungicide Plus Insecticide. Agronomy. 2023;13:2823. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13112823. - DOI
    1. Holík M., Kunzová E., Ludvíková V., Hakl J. Impact of Long-Term Manure and Mineral Fertilization on Accumulation of Non-Structural Carbohydrates in Lucerne Forage. Agronomy. 2022;12:639. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12030639. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources