Backcrossing Failure between Sikitita Olive and Its Male Parent Arbequina: Implications for the Self-Incompatibility System and Pollination Designs of Olive Orchards
- PMID: 39458819
- PMCID: PMC11510835
- DOI: 10.3390/plants13202872
Backcrossing Failure between Sikitita Olive and Its Male Parent Arbequina: Implications for the Self-Incompatibility System and Pollination Designs of Olive Orchards
Abstract
Backcrossing between Sikitita and its male parent Arbequina, offers the possibility to check the suitability of different self-incompatibility models proposed for olive. To determine Sikitita's response to self- and cross-pollination treatments, including pollination with its father Arbequina, we compared the parameters following pollen-pistil interaction, the resulting initial and final fruit set, and the paternity of the seeds produced under different crosses. The results showed that Sikitita behaves as a self-incompatible cultivar due to the inhibition of pollen tube growth in the pistil of self-pollinated flowers. This incompatibility reaction led to a significant reduction of self-fertilization and fruit set. Seed paternity analyses confirmed the self-incompatibility response of Sikitita. A similar incompatibility response was observed in Sikitita flowers when hand-pollinated with pollen of Arbequina and Koroneiki. On the contrary, cross-pollination with Arbosana gave excellent results, with analyses showing that pollen of Arbosana is largely preferred by Sikitita to father its seeds more than the pollen of other cultivars presented in the orchard. The backcross failure of Sikitita with Arbequina pollen suggests that the self-incompatibility system in olives is not of the gametophytic type. In contrast, pollination tests fit features of previously reported sporophytic self-incompatibility systems. However, some amendments are proposed, among them the incompatibility groups for Sikitita and Koroneiki.
Keywords: Olea europaea; fruit set; gametophytic self-incompatibility; pollen–pistil interactions; pollination groups; pollinizer selection; seed paternity; sporophytic self-incompatibility.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
References
-
- Cuevas J. Incompatibilidad polen-pistilo. In: Barranco D., Caballero J.M., Martín A., Rallo L., Del Río C., Tous J., Trujillo I., editors. Variedades de Olivo Cultivadas en España. 1st ed. Junta de Andalucía, Mundi-Prensa and COI; Seville, Spain: 2004. pp. 303–308.
-
- Bradley M.V., Griggs W.H. Morphological evidence of incompatibility in Olea europaea L. Phytomorphology. 1963;13:141–156.
-
- Cuevas J., Rallo L., Rapoport H.F. Staining procedure for the observation of olive pollen tube behaviour. Acta Hortic. 1994;356:264–267. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1994.356.56. - DOI
-
- Ateyyeh A.F., Stösser R., Qrunfleh M. Reproductive biology of the olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivar ‘Nabali Baladi’. J. Appl. Bot.-Angew. Bot. 2000;74:255–270.
-
- Vuletin Selak G., Cuevas J., Ban S.G., Perica S. Pollen tube performance in assessment of compatibility in olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Sci. Hortic. 2014;165:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.10.041. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
