Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 14;29(20):4861.
doi: 10.3390/molecules29204861.

Cyclization Strategies in Carbonyl-Olefin Metathesis: An Up-to-Date Review

Affiliations
Review

Cyclization Strategies in Carbonyl-Olefin Metathesis: An Up-to-Date Review

Xiaoke Zhang. Molecules. .

Abstract

The metathesis reaction between carbonyl compounds and olefins has emerged as a potent strategy for facilitating swift functional group interconversion and the construction of intricate organic structures through the creation of novel carbon-carbon double bonds. To date, significant progress has been made in carbonyl-olefin metathesis reactions, where oxetane, pyrazolidine, 1,3-diol, and metal alkylidene have been proved to be key intermediates. Recently, several reviews have been disclosed, focusing on distinct catalytic approaches for achieving carbonyl-olefin metathesis. However, the summarization of cyclization strategies for constructing aromatic heterocyclic frameworks through carbonyl-olefin metathesis reactions has rarely been reported. Consequently, we present an up-to-date review of the cyclization strategies in carbonyl-olefin metathesis, categorizing them into three main groups: the formation of monocyclic compounds, bicyclic compounds, and polycyclic compounds. This review delves into the underlying mechanism, scope, and applications, offering a comprehensive perspective on the current strength and the limitation of this field.

Keywords: bicyclic compounds; carbonyl–olefin metathesis; cyclization; monocyclic compounds; polycyclic compounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Strategies for carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The classification of carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
The synthesis of cycloalkenes via carbonyl–olefin metathesis reaction.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2
Olefinic ester ring-closing metathesis: using a reduced titanium akylidene.
Scheme 3
Scheme 3
Diversity-oriented synthesis of carbocyclic.
Scheme 4
Scheme 4
Catalytic intramolecular carbonyl–olefin reaction.
Scheme 5
Scheme 5
Iron(III)-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 6
Scheme 6
FeCl3-catalyzed ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 7
Scheme 7
The synthesis of 3-aryl-2,5-dihydropyrroles.
Scheme 8
Scheme 8
Catalytic carbonyl–olefin metathesis of aliphatic ketones.
Scheme 9
Scheme 9
Catalytic, transannular carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 10
Scheme 10
Tetrahydropyridines via FeCl3-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 11
Scheme 11
Gallium-catalyzed tandem carbonyl–olefin metathesis/transfer hydrogenation.
Scheme 12
Scheme 12
Super-electrophilic aluminum (III)-ion pair-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 13
Scheme 13
AuCl3-catalyzed ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 14
Scheme 14
The synthesis of cyclopentene mediated by bis(perchlorocatecholato) germane.
Scheme 15
Scheme 15
InCl3-catalyzed intramolecular carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 16
Scheme 16
Intramolecular cycloreversion mediated by BF3.Et2O.
Scheme 17
Scheme 17
Brønsted acid-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 18
Scheme 18
The synthesis of 2,5-dihydropyrroles via carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 19
Scheme 19
Carbonyl–olefin metathesis catalyzed by HFIP and pTSA.
Scheme 20
Scheme 20
Brønsted acid-catalyzed intramolecular carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 21
Scheme 21
Tropylium-promoted carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 22
Scheme 22
Carbonyl–olefin metathesis catalyzed by molecular iodine.
Scheme 23
Scheme 23
Iodonium-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 24
Scheme 24
Al-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 25
Scheme 25
Au-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 26
Scheme 26
Titanocene alkylidene complex-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 27
Scheme 27
The construction of the JKL, OPQ, and UVW ring systems of Maitotoxin.
Scheme 28
Scheme 28
Approach to 1,4-dihydroquinoline via carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 29
Scheme 29
Approach to fused ether ring systems via carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 30
Scheme 30
Olefinic ester cyclizations using Takai–Utimoto-reduced titanium alkylidenes.
Scheme 31
Scheme 31
Ti alkylidenes mediated carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 32
Scheme 32
Olefinic lactone cyclization to macrocycles.
Scheme 33
Scheme 33
Olefinic amide and olefinic lactam cyclizations.
Scheme 34
Scheme 34
Photoprotolytic-mediated carbonyl–olefin metathesis reactions.
Scheme 35
Scheme 35
The synthesis of bicyclic compounds via photoinduced intramolecular cyclization.
Scheme 36
Scheme 36
The synthesis of bicyclic compounds mediated by TfOH.
Scheme 37
Scheme 37
BF3.Et2O mediated intramolecular carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 38
Scheme 38
Carbocation-catalyzed ring-closing aldehyde–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 39
Scheme 39
Hydrazine-catalyzed ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 40
Scheme 40
Synthesis of 1,2-dihydroquinolines via ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 41
Scheme 41
Ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis catalyzed by titanium reagents.
Scheme 42
Scheme 42
Olefin metathesis in cyclic ether formation.
Scheme 43
Scheme 43
The application of olefin metathesis.
Scheme 44
Scheme 44
Two-directional olefinic ester ring-closing metathesis.
Scheme 45
Scheme 45
The synthesis of tricycle compound.
Scheme 46
Scheme 46
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons via iron(III)-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 47
Scheme 47
Synthesis of angucycline derivatives using carbonyl–olefin metathesis.
Scheme 48
Scheme 48
Brønsted acid-catalyzed carbonyl–olefin metathesis. A represents the yield obtained under condition 1); B represents the yield obtained under condition 2); C represents the yield obtained under condition 3).
Scheme 49
Scheme 49
Hydrazine-catalyzed ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis.

References

    1. Johansson Seechurn C.C.C., Kitching M.O., Colacot T.J., Snieckus V. Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling: A Historical Contextual Perspective to the 2010 Nobel Prize. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:5062–5085. doi: 10.1002/anie.201107017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang S., Zhang Y.L., Ba Y.Y., Zhang J.Y., Sun D.M. Study and Applications of Stereoselective Olefin Metathesis Reactions. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2020;40:2725–2741. doi: 10.6023/cjoc202003054. - DOI
    1. Liu P., Ai C.J. Olefin Metathesis Reaction in Rubber Chemistry and Industry and Beyond. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018;57:3807–3820. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03830. - DOI
    1. Fürstner A. Olefin Metathesis and Beyond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000;39:3012–3043. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20000901)39:17<3012::AID-ANIE3012>3.0.CO;2-G. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Connon S.J., Blechert S. Recent Developments in Olefin Cross-Metathesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003;42:1900–1923. doi: 10.1002/anie.200200556. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources