Evaluation of a Commercial Rapid Molecular Point-of-Care Assay for Differential Diagnosis Between SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B Infections in a Pediatric Setting
- PMID: 39459970
- PMCID: PMC11512318
- DOI: 10.3390/v16101638
Evaluation of a Commercial Rapid Molecular Point-of-Care Assay for Differential Diagnosis Between SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A/B Infections in a Pediatric Setting
Abstract
Given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to identify SARS-CoV-2 and to differentiate it from other respiratory viral infections, especially influenza A and B, in various critical settings. Since their introduction, the use of rapid antigen tests has spread worldwide, but there is variability in their diagnostic accuracy. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0, a molecular point-of-care test (POCT) based on enzymatic isothermal amplification for the differential diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B in a pediatric emergency setting. A cohort of pediatric patients admitted between December 2022 and February 2023 were simultaneously tested with the POCT and standard laboratory molecular assay. Our findings showed high negative agreement of the POCT assay across the different age groups for SARS-CoV-2, influenza A, and influenza B (more than 98.0%), while its positive agreement varied significantly for the abovementioned viral species from 50.0% to 100%. These results highlight the potential of the ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 POCT assay as a reliable and rapid tool for excluding SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A/B infections in symptomatic pediatric patients, although its variable positive agreement suggests a need for confirmatory RT-qPCR testing in certain clinical and epidemiological settings in order to ensure accurate diagnosis and appropriate patient management.
Keywords: ID NOW; SARS-CoV-2; influenza A/B; pediatric respiratory infections; point-of-care testing; rapid molecular assay.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Perin J., Mulick A., Yeung D., Villavicencio F., Lopez G., Strong K.L., Prieto-Merino D., Cousens S., Black R.E., Liu L. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-19: An updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 2022;6:106–115. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00311-4. Erratum in Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2022, 6, e4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Global Health Estimates: Leading Causes of Death [Internet]. World Health Organization. 2020. [(accessed on 11 April 2024)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-est....
-
- da Silva S.J.R., do Nascimento J.C.F., Germano Mendes R.P., Guarines K.M., Targino Alves da Silva C., da Silva P.G., de Magalhães J.J.F., Vigar J.R.J., Silva-Júnior A., Kohl A., et al. Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned. ACS Infect. Dis. 2022;8:1758–1814. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00204. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Why Is COVID-19 Data Being Presented as Weekly Statistics? [Internet]. World Health Organization. [(accessed on 11 April 2024)]. Available online: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases?n=c.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous