Students' perceptions of knowledge reinforcement on indirect prosthetic dental material choices by a translational approach
- PMID: 39460476
- PMCID: PMC12004345
- DOI: 10.1002/jdd.13760
Students' perceptions of knowledge reinforcement on indirect prosthetic dental material choices by a translational approach
Abstract
Purpose/objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate students' perceptions of the reinforcement of knowledge via innovative, case-based, hands-on learning regarding indirect prosthetic material choice.
Methods: Six different clinical cases that represented common prosthetics were used in this simulation training. In each case, clinical pictures were associated with three-dimensional (3D)-printed replicates of final restorations and PolyJet polychromatic models with the goal of enabling students to deliberate and exchange ideas in small groups. After a debriefing session regarding the therapeutic potentialities of the first three cases alongside teachers, a lecture concerning prosthetic material choices was provided, and a zirconia crown was stained by each student to enable them to obtain a better understanding of the dental technician profession. Finally, the latter three cases were studied and analyzed in the same manner. The students' perceived reinforcement of knowledge was recorded before and 1 month after the hands-on simulation training experience, and their satisfaction was evaluated immediately thereafter on Likert scales. Students' perceived reinforcement of knowledge was subjected to statistical evaluation.
Results: A high level of overall satisfaction was observed (4.60). All of the items pertaining to students' satisfaction received scores >3. One month after this hands-on approach, students' confidence in their ability to choose a material on the basis of its mechanical, optical, and luting properties increased significantly (from 2.58 to 3.64; from 2.83 to 3.64; and from 2.72 to 3.58, respectively) (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: This innovative, hands-on approach had a significant positive effect on students' perceived reinforcement of knowledge.
Keywords: 3D printing; dental; education; prosthetics; simulation.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Dental Education published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Dental Education Association.
Conflict of interest statement
Jean‐Yves Ciers, Chakib Taleb, Catherine Nardari, and Nathalie Keosounvah are employees of the French division of Ivoclar. The other authors of this publication declare that they have no conflicts of interest in connection with this publication.
Figures
References
-
- Sulaiman TA. Materials in digital dentistry—a review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):171‐181. - PubMed
-
- Brand HS, Kamell H, Kharbanda AK, et al. Students' perceptions of materials and techniques used at European dental schools in the education of fixed prosthodontics. J Dent Educ. 2013;77(9):1140‐1146. - PubMed
-
- Haden NK, Bell KP, Bottino MC, et al. Dental education 2026: a scenario exploration. J Dent Educ. 2022;86(3):343‐351. - PubMed
-
- Ihm J, Shin Y, Seo DG. Did clinical reasoning and knowledge questions during team‐based learning enhance dental students' performance in esthetic dentistry? J Dent Educ. 2020;84(4):495‐501. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
