Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov:303:744-755.
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.051. Epub 2024 Oct 25.

A Qualitative Study of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring After Thoracic Surgery

Alix Boisson-Walsh  1 , Chase Cox  2 , Meghan O'Leary  3 , Sachita Shrestha  3 , Philip Carr  3 , Amanda L Gentry  2 , Lauren Hill  2 , Bernice Newsome  2 , Jason Long  2 , Benjamin Haithcock  2 , Angela M Stover  4 , Ethan Basch  3 , Jennifer Leeman  5 , Gita N Mody  6
Affiliations

A Qualitative Study of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Symptom Monitoring After Thoracic Surgery

Alix Boisson-Walsh et al. J Surg Res. 2024 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic surgery is a mainstay of therapy for lung cancer and other chronic pulmonary conditions, but recovery is often complicated. Digital health systems can facilitate remote postoperative symptom management yet obstacles persist in their routine clinical adoption. This study aimed to identify patient-perceived barriers and facilitators to using an electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) monitoring platform specially designed to detect complications from thoracic surgery postdischarge.

Methods: Patients (n = 16) who underwent thoracic surgery and participated in an ePRO parent study completed semistructured interviews, which were analyzed using thematic content analysis and iterative team-based coding. Themes were mapped onto the three domains of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of behavior framework to inform ePRO design and implementation improvements.

Results: Analysis demonstrated seven dominant themes, including barriers (1. postoperative patient physical and mental health, 2. lack of access to email and poor internet connectivity, 3. lack of clarity on ePRO use in routine clinical care, and 4. symptom item redundancy) as well as facilitators (5. ease of the ePRO assessment completion, 6. engagement with the surgical care team on ePRO use, and 7. increased awareness of symptom experience through ePRO use). Suggested ePRO improvements included offering alternatives to web-based completion, tailoring symptom assessments to individual patients, and the need for patient education on ePROs for perioperative care.

Conclusions: Addressable barriers and facilitators to implementation of ePRO symptom monitoring in the thoracic surgical patient population postdischarge have been identified. Future work will test the impact of design improvements on implementation outcomes of feasibility and acceptability.

Keywords: Digital health technology; Lung cancer; Patient-reported outcomes; Postacute care; Qualitative research; Thoracic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations of interest: none.

References

    1. Potter AL, Puttaraju T, Sulit JC, Beqari J, Mathey Andrews CA, et al. Assessing the number of annual lung cancer resections performed in the United States. Shanghai Chest 2023:7.
    1. Merlo A, Carlson R, Espey J 3rd, Williams BM, Balakrishnan P, et al. Postoperative Symptom Burden in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022:64:254–267. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fiorelli S, Cioffi L, Menna C, Ibrahim M, De Blasi RA, et al. Chronic Pain After Lung Resection: Risk Factors, Neuropathic Pain, and Quality of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020:60:326–335. - PubMed
    1. Avery KNL, Blazeby JM, Chalmers KA, Batchelor TJP, Casali G, et al. Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020:27:1259–1271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gapstur RL Symptom burden: a concept analysis and implications for oncology nurses. Oncol Nurs Forum 2007:34:673–680. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources