Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 26;18(1):384.
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02135-x.

Scientific production on robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis on its current world status

Affiliations

Scientific production on robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis on its current world status

Yeisson Rivero-Moreno et al. J Robot Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery (RMBS) has emerged as an innovative approach in the treatment of severe obesity by combining the ergonomic precision of robotic technology and instrumentation with the established benefits of weight loss surgery. This study employs a bibliometric approach to identify local research trends and worldwide patterns in RMBS.

Materials & methods: The research methodology used "robotic" and "metabolic" or "bariatric surgery" to search Web of Science. Articles that were published prior to December 31st, 2023, were included. The analyses were developed using the Rayyan and Bibliometric, in R Studio.

Results: 265 articles from 51 different journals were included. Scientific production of RMBS experienced a significant annual growth rate of 21.96% from 2003 to 2023, resulting in an average of 12.6 papers published per year. A high correlation (R2 = 0.94) was found between the year and number of articles. The mean number of citations per document was 13.25. Approximately 90% of the journals were classified as zone 3, according to the Bradford categorization. International collaboration was identified in 10.57% of cases, with the University of California and the University of Illinois being the most common organizations. The countries with the highest number of corresponding authors, in descending order, were the United States of America, China, and Switzerland.

Conclusion: Scientific production in RMBS has experienced sustained growth since the first original publications in 2003. While it has not yet reached the volume, impact, and international collaboration seen in studies related to non-robotic metabolic and bariatric surgery, RBMS holds potential that remains to be explored.

Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Bibliometric analysis; Metabolic surgery; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Diabetes Association (2018) 7 Obesity management for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 41(Suppl 1):S65-72 - DOI
    1. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE et al (2012) Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 366(17):1567–1576 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bindal V, Bhatia P, Dudeja U, Kalhan S, Khetan M, John S et al (2015) Review of contemporary role of robotics in bariatric surgery. J Minim Access Surg 11(1):16–21 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Zhang Z, Miao L, Ren Z, Li Y (2021) Robotic bariatric surgery for the obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 35(6):2440–2456 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2017) Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informet 11(4):959–975 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources