Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 27;8(1):244.
doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00732-5.

Potential of pre-diagnostic metabolomics for colorectal cancer risk assessment or early detection

Affiliations

Potential of pre-diagnostic metabolomics for colorectal cancer risk assessment or early detection

Teresa Seum et al. NPJ Precis Oncol. .

Abstract

This systematic review investigates the efficacy of metabolite biomarkers for risk assessment or early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its precursors, focusing on pre-diagnostic biospecimens. Searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS through December 2023 identified relevant prospective studies. Relevant data were extracted, and the risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool. Among the 26 studies included, significant heterogeneity existed for case numbers, metabolite identification, and validation approaches. Thirteen studies evaluated individual metabolites, mainly lipids, while eleven studies derived metabolite panels, and two studies did both. Nine panels were internally validated, resulting in an area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.69 to 0.95 for CRC precursors and 0.72 to 1.0 for CRC. External validation was limited to one panel (AUC = 0.72). Metabolite panels and lipid-based biomarkers show promise for CRC risk assessment and early detection but require standardization and extensive validation for clinical use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Associations between individual metabolites and colorectal cancer risk, categorized by direction of association.
A Inversely associated metabolites with colorectal cancer risk. B Positively associated metabolites with colorectal cancer risk. Note: metabolites are grouped by Super Class from the Human Metabolome Database. Metabolites reportedas ratios are excluded.

References

    1. Bray, F. et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin.74, 229–263 (2024). - PubMed
    1. Dekker, E., Tanis, P. J., Vleugels, J. L. A., Kasi, P. M. & Wallace, M. B. Colorectal cancer. Lancet394, 1467–1480 (2019). - PubMed
    1. Shaukat, A. & Levin, T. R. Current and future colorectal cancer screening strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.19, 521–531 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner, H., Stock, C. & Hoffmeister, M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ348, g2467 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maida, M. et al. Screening of colorectal cancer: present and future. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.17, 1131–1146 (2017). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources