Derivation and Validation of the PRECISE-HBR Score to Predict Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- PMID: 39462482
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072009
Derivation and Validation of the PRECISE-HBR Score to Predict Bleeding After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Abstract
Background: Accurate bleeding risk stratification after percutaneous coronary intervention is important for treatment individualization. However, there is still an unmet need for a more precise and standardized identification of patients at high bleeding risk. We derived and validated a novel bleeding risk score by augmenting the Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score with the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria.
Methods: The derivation cohort comprised 29 188 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, of whom 1136 (3.9%) had Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3 or 5 bleeding at 1 year, from 4 contemporary real-world registries and the XIENCE V USA trial. The PRECISE-DAPT score was refitted with a Fine-Gray model in the derivation cohort and extended with the ARC-HBR criteria. The primary outcome was BARC 3 or 5 bleeding within 1 year. Independent predictors of BARC 3 or 5 bleeding were selected at multivariable analysis (P<0.01). The discrimination of the score was internally assessed with apparent validation and cross-validation. The score was externally validated in 4578 patients from the MASTER DAPT trial (Management of High Bleeding Risk Patients Post Bioresorbable Polymer Coated Stent Implantation With an Abbreviated Versus Prolonged DAPT Regimen) and 5970 patients from the STOPDAPT-2 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-2) total cohort.
Results: The PRECISE-HBR score (age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin, white blood cell count, previous bleeding, oral anticoagulation, and ARC-HBR criteria) showed an area under the curve (AUC) for 1-year BARC 3 or 5 bleeding of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71-0.74) at apparent validation, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) at cross-validation, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80) in MASTER DAPT, and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.66-0.79) in STOPDAPT-2, with superior discrimination compared with PRECISE-DAPT (cross-validation: ΔAUC, 0.01; P=0.02; MASTER DAPT: ΔAUC, 0.05; P=0.004; STOPDAPT-2: ΔAUC, 0.02; P=0.20) and other risk scores. In the derivation cohort, a cutoff of 23 points identified 11 414 patients (39.1%) with a 1-year BARC 3 or 5 bleeding risk ≥4%. An alternative version of the score, including acute myocardial infarction on admission instead of white blood cell count, showed similar predictive ability.
Conclusions: The PRECISE-HBR score is a contemporary, simple 7-item risk score to predict bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention, offering a moderate improvement in discrimination over multiple existing scores. Further evaluation is required to assess its impact on clinical practice.
Keywords: anticoagulants; dual anti-platelet therapy; hemorrhage; percutaneous coronary intervention; risk; stents.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr Valgimigli reports grants and personal fees from Terumo and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, IDORSIA PHARMACEUTICALS LTD, Universität Basel, Department Klinische Forschung, Bristol Myers Squib SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Gragnano reports personal fees from SANOFI for advisory board outside the submitted work. Dr Heg is affiliated with the Department of Clinical Research (DCR), University of Bern, which has a staff policy of not accepting honoraria or consultancy fees. DCR Bern is involved in the design, conduct, or analysis of clinical studies funded by not-for-profit and for-profit organizations. Pharmaceutical and medical device companies provide direct funding to some of these studies. Dr Räber reports grants or contracts from Abbott, Biotronik, BostonScientific, Heartfolow, Sanofi, and Regeneron; consulting fees from Canon; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbott, Amgen, Sanofi, and Occlutech; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Abbott, Amgen, NovoNordisk, Medtronic, and Sanofi outside the submitted work. Dr ten Berg reports support by an institutional research grant from AstraZeneca for the present article. Dr Bär reports grants or contracts from Medis Medical Imaging Systems, Abbott, Bangerter-Rhyner Stiftung, and Swiss National Science Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Kimura reports research grants from Abbott and Boston Scientific, outside the submitted work. Dr Leonardi reports grants from AstraZeneca and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer/BMS, ICON, Chiesi, and Novo Nordisk, outside the submitted work. Dr Bhatt reports the following relationships outside the submitted work: Advisory Board: Angiowave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, and Stasys; board of directors: American Heart Association, New York City, Angiowave (stock options), Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), and High Enroll (stock); consultant: Broadview Ventures, GlaxoSmithKline, Hims, SFJ, and Youngene; data monitoring committee: Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic, Contego Medical (chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical; for ALLAY-HF, funded by Alleviant Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute, and Rutgers University (for the National Institutes of Health–funded MINT Trial); honoraria: American College of Cardiology (senior associate editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; chair, ACC accreditation oversight committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol-Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (editor in chief,
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical