Evolving Assessment in Medical Education: Exploring the Role of Open-Book Examinations
- PMID: 39463755
- PMCID: PMC11511835
- DOI: 10.30476/jamp.2024.102078.1955
Evolving Assessment in Medical Education: Exploring the Role of Open-Book Examinations
Abstract
Introduction: The landscape of medical education has witnessed significant transformations over the past decades, particularly with the advent of active teaching methodologies. However, despite these advancements, the traditional theoretical assessment methods have remained largely unchanged. This lack of evolution in assessment systems poses a challenge as it is crucial for assessment methods to evolve in tandem with teaching approaches to ensure a comprehensive and effective learning process in medical education. This paper reviews the integration and effectiveness of open-book examinations (OBEs) in medical education, reflecting their growing significance.
Methods: An integrative review of the literature was conducted, drawing from a range of relevant publications over the last decade, sourced from databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC. The inclusion criteria focused on full-text articles in English, with search terms including "medicine," "assessment," "open book examination," "open book exam," and "open book assessment," combined using Boolean operators. Thirteen publications were selected and critically appraised using The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist.
Results: The analysis identified three primary thematic categories: "Teaching Strategy for Pandemic and Challenging Conditions," "Tool of Learning & Educational Impact", and "Operational Challenges & Future Directions". These themes were explored to understand the role and impact of open-book examinations in medical education.
Conclusion: The findings indicate that open-book examinations are a crucial component in the evolving landscape of medical education. While certain reservations remain, open-book examinations have shown significant potential in fostering critical thinking, argumentation skills, and lifelong learning among medical students. They reflect the ongoing evolution of knowledge in the medical field and contribute to the development of professionals' adept at navigating and applying complex information. Further research is recommended to solidify these findings and expand the understanding of open-book examinations in medical education.
Keywords: Assessment; Educational assessment; Medical education.
Copyright: © Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessing Medical Student Perceptions of Open-Book Exams for Self-Directed Learning.Cureus. 2024 Apr 28;16(4):e59218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59218. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38807839 Free PMC article.
-
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447007
-
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447004
-
STEM exam performance: Open- versus closed-book methods in the large language model era.Clin Teach. 2025 Feb;22(1):e13839. doi: 10.1111/tct.13839. Epub 2024 Nov 4. Clin Teach. 2025. PMID: 39496553 Free PMC article.
-
Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review.JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Jun 15;5(1):e13930. doi: 10.2196/13930. JMIR Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31199295 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Boursicot K, Kemp S, Wilkinson T, Findyartini A, Canning C, Cilliers F, et al. Performance assessment: Consensus statement and recommendations from the 2020 Ottawa Conference. Med Teach. 2021;43(1):58–67. - PubMed
-
- Pangaro L, Ten Cate O. Frameworks for learner assessment in medicine: AMEE Guide No. 78. Med Teach. 2018;35(6):e1197–210. - PubMed
-
- Myyry L, Joutsenvirta T. Open-book, open-web online examinations: Developing examination practices to support university students’ learning and self-efficacy. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2015;16(2):119–32.
-
- Epstein RM. Assessment in Medical Education. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356(4):387–96. - PubMed
-
- GMC. Assessment in undergraduate medical education-Tomorrow’s Doctors. UK: General Medical Council-UK; 2018.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous