Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 24;18(5):054113.
doi: 10.1063/5.0226620. eCollection 2024 Sep.

In situ 3D polymerization (IS-3DP): Implementing an aqueous two-phase system for the formation of 3D objects inside a microfluidic channel

Affiliations

In situ 3D polymerization (IS-3DP): Implementing an aqueous two-phase system for the formation of 3D objects inside a microfluidic channel

Guillermo Ramirez-Alvarado et al. Biomicrofluidics. .

Abstract

Rapid prototyping and fabrication of microstructure have been revolutionized by 3D printing, especially stereolithography (SLA) based techniques due to the superior spatial resolution they offer. However, SLA-type 3D printing faces intrinsic challenges in multi-material integration and adaptive Z-layer slicing due to the use of a vat and a mechanically controlled Z-layer generation. In this paper, we present the conceptualization of a novel paradigm which uses dynamic and multi-phase laminar flow in a microfluidic channel to achieve fabrication of 3D objects. Our strategy, termed "in situ 3D polymerization," combines in situ polymerization and co-flow aqueous two-phase systems and achieves slicing, polymerization, and layer-by-layer printing of 3D structures in a microchannel. The printing layer could be predicted and controlled solely by programming the fluid input. Our strategy provides generalizability to fit with different light sources, pattern generators, and photopolymers. The integration of the microfluidic channel could enable high-degree multi-material integration without complicated modification of the 3D printer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

    1. Bhattacharjee N. et al., “The upcoming 3D-printing revolution in microfluidics,” Lab Chip 16(10), 1720–1742 (2016). 10.1039/C6LC00163G - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shafique H. et al., “High-resolution low-cost LCD 3D printing for microfluidics and organ-on-a-chip devices,” Lab Chip 24(10), 2774–2790 (2024). 10.1039/D3LC01125A - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kulasinghe A. et al., “Enrichment of circulating head and neck tumour cells using spiral microfluidic technology,” Sci. Rep. 7(1), 42517 (2017). 10.1038/srep42517 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinnen H. et al., “3D-printed microfluidic one-way valves and pumps,” Micromachines 14(7), 1286 (2023). 10.3390/mi14071286 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gong H., Woolley A. T., and Nordin G. P., “High density 3D printed microfluidic valves, pumps, and multiplexers,” Lab Chip 16(13), 2450–2458 (2016). 10.1039/C6LC00565A - DOI - PMC - PubMed