Specialty-Based Ambulatory Quality Improvement Program: A Specialty-Specific Ambulatory Metric Project
- PMID: 39466606
- DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000481
Specialty-Based Ambulatory Quality Improvement Program: A Specialty-Specific Ambulatory Metric Project
Abstract
Background and objectives: Healthcare is increasingly being delivered in the outpatient setting, but robust quality improvement programs and performance metrics are lacking in ambulatory care, particularly specialty-based ambulatory care.
Methods: To promote quality improvement in ambulatory care, we developed an infrastructure to create specialty-specific quality measures and dashboards that could be used to display providers' performance across relevant measures to individual providers and institutional leaders.
Results: The products of this program include a governance and infrastructure for specialty-specific ambulatory quality metrics as well as two distinct dashboards for data display. One dashboard is provider-facing, displaying provider's performance on specialty-specific measures as compared to institutional standards. The second dashboard is a leadership dashboard that provides overall and provider-level information on performance across measures.
Conclusions: The Specialty-based Ambulatory Quality program reflects a systematic, institutionally-supported quality improvement framework that can be applied across diverse ambulatory specialties. As next steps, we plan to evaluate the program's impact on provider performance across measures and expand this program to other specialties practicing in the outpatient setting.
Keywords: ambulatory care; clinical competence; health care; health metrics; quality indicators.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Sarkar U. Tip of the iceberg: patient safety incidents in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(7):477-479. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005006. - DOI
-
- Ashman JJ, Okeyode TRP. Characteristics of office-based physician visits, 2016NCHS Data Brief, no. In: National Center for Health Statistics. Hyattsville: MD; 2019: 331.
-
- Bishay K, Causada-Calo N, Scaffidi M.A., et al. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(5):1030-1040 e9. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3865. - DOI
-
- Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AE, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(14):1298-1306. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1309086. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials