Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):2982.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20388-x.

Implementing a prenatal health screening intervention for future fathers in Montreuil, France: most users are immigrants facing hardship

Collaborators, Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Implementing a prenatal health screening intervention for future fathers in Montreuil, France: most users are immigrants facing hardship

Pauline Penot et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Prenatal care provides pregnant women with repeated opportunities for prevention, screening and diagnosis that have no current extension to future fathers. It also contributes to women's general better access to health. The goal of PARTAGE study was to evaluate the level and determinants of adherence to a prenatal prevention consultation dedicated to men.

Methods: Between January 2021 and April 2022, we conducted a monocentric interventional study in Montreuil hospital. We assessed the acceptance of a prenatal prevention consultation newly offered to every future father, through their pregnant partner's prior consent to provide their contact details.

Results: Three thousand thirty-eight women provided contact information used to reach the fathers; effective contact was established with 2,516 men, of whom 1,333 (53%) came for prenatal prevention consultation. Immigrant men were more likely to come than French-born men (56% versus 49%, p < 0·001), and the more they faced social hardship, the more likely they were to accept the offer. In multivariate analysis, men born in Subsaharan Africa and Asia were twice as likely to attend the consultation as those born in Europe or North America.

Conclusion: Acceptance of this new offer was high. Moreover, this consultation was perceived by vulnerable immigrant men as an opportunity to integrate a healthcare system they would have otherwise remained deprived of.

Trial registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, US National Library of Medicine https://classic.

Clinicaltrials: gov/ct2/show/NCT05085717 Clinical Trial number: NCT05085717 . Date of registration: 20/10/2021.

Keywords: Gender inequalities; HIV; Health insurance coverage; Migrants health; Prenatal health; Sexually transmitted infections; Social inequalities in health; Vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart, Montreuil (France) 2021–2022
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Women’s and men’s characteristics associated with men’s acceptance of Father’s Prenatal Prevention Consultation (FPPC), Montreuil (France), 2021–20221 1Reference groups in graph a are: France for region of birth, secondary school for education level, couple with children for parity, non precarious job for employment; graph b: France for region of birth, secondary school for education level, <30 for age, any job for employment, couple with children for parity, >= 4 years for union’s duration; graph c: Europe/North America/Australia for region of birth, secondary school for education level, >= 7 years for length of stay, study/join someone for main reason for coming to France, regular situation for administrative status, personal house for housing conditions, couple with children for parity; graph d: Europe/North America for region of birth, secondary school for education level, >= 7 years for length of stay, regular situation for administrative status, couple with children for parity. For logistic regressions, see Additional file 3

References

    1. Greig A, Kimmel M, Lang J. Men, Masculinities & Development: Broadening Our Work Towards Gender Equality.2000.p. 22. (Gender in development monograph series). Report No.: 10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246771572_Men_Masculinities_Dev.... Accessed 21 Aug 2023.
    1. Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques, éditeur. Femmes et hommes, l’égalité en question. Éd. 2022. Montrouge: INSEE; 2022. (INSEE Références).
    1. Sandman D, Simantov E, An C. Out of touch: American men and the health care system - Commonwealth Fund Men’s and Women’s Health Survey Findings. USA: The Commonwealth Fund; 2000.
    1. Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(2):147–52. - PubMed
    1. Koechlin A. La norme gynécologique: ce que la médecine fait au corps des femmes. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam; 2022. p. 305.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data