Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Oct 14:15:1418613.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1418613. eCollection 2024.

Surviving septic patients endotyped with a functional assay demonstrate active immune responses

Affiliations
Observational Study

Surviving septic patients endotyped with a functional assay demonstrate active immune responses

Adam D Price et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis is a complex clinical syndrome characterized by a heterogenous host immune response. Historically, static protein and transcriptomic metrics have been employed to describe the underlying biology. Here, we tested the hypothesis that ex vivo functional TNF expression as well as an immunologic endotype based on both IFNγ and TNF expression could be used to model clinical outcomes in sepsis patients.

Methods: This prospective, observational study of patient samples collected from the SPIES consortium included patients at five health systems enrolled over 17 months, with 46 healthy control patients, 68 ICU patients without sepsis, and 107 ICU patients with sepsis. Whole blood was collected on day 1, 4, and 7 of ICU admission. Outcomes included in-hospital and 180-day mortality and non-favorable discharge disposition defined by skilled nursing facility, long-term acute care facility, or hospice. Whole blood ELISpot assays were conducted to quantify TNF expression [stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] and IFNγ expression (stimulated by anti-CD3/CD28 mAb), which were then used for assignment to one of four subgroups including an 'immunocompetent', 'immunosuppressed endotype', and two 'mixed' endotypes.

Results: Whole blood TNF spot-forming units were significantly increased in septic and CINS patients on days 4 and 7 compared to healthy subjects. In contrast, TNF expression per cell on days 1, 4, and 7 was significantly lower in both septic and critically ill non-septic (CINS) patients compared to healthy subjects. Early increases in total TNF expression were associated with favorable discharge disposition and lower in-hospital mortality. 'Immunocompetent' endotype patients on day 1 had a higher proportion of favorable to non-favorable discharges compared to the 'immunosuppressed' endotype. Similarly, 'immunocompetent' endotype patients on day 4 had a higher in-hospital survival compared to the 'immunosuppressed' endotype patients. Finally, among septic patients, decreased total TNF and IFNγ expression were associated with 180-day mortality.

Conclusions: Increased ex vivo whole blood TNF expression is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Further, the early 'immunocompetent' endotype is associated with favorable discharge and improved in-hospital and 180-day survival. The ability to functionally stratify septic patients based on blood cell function ex vivo may allow for identification of future immune modulating therapies.

Keywords: IL-6; critical illness; late mortality; prediction modeling; procalcitonin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MM is a member of Immune Functional Diagnostics, LLC and receives no direct financial compensation. Immune Functional Diagnostics, LLC is developing predictive metrics in critical illness and this technology is evaluated in this research. KR is a member of Immune Functional Diagnostics, LLC and receives no direct financial compensation. Immune Functional Diagnostics, LLC is developing predictive metrics in critical illness and this technology is evaluated in this research. SB and the University of Florida may receive royalty income based on a technology developed by SB and others and licensed by Washington University in St. Louis to IFDx LLC. That technology is evaluated in this research. LM and the University of Florida may receive royalty income based on a technology developed by LM and others and licensed by Washington University in St. Louis to IFDx LLC. That technology is evaluated in this research. RH and Washington University in St. Louis may receive royalty income based on a technology developed by RH and others and licensed by Washington University in St. Louis to IFDx LLC. That technology is evaluated in this research. He is also supported by R35 GM-126928, awarded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. CC is supported by NIH grant R01GM139046. CC and the University of Cincinnati may receive royalty income based on a technology developed by CC and others and licensed by Washington University in St. Louis to IFDx LLC. That technology is evaluated in this research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
LPS-stimulated TNF expression as determined by ELISpot spot forming units (SFU) and spot size (SS) in Sepsis, and CINS patients at timepoints 1, 2, and 3 following ICU admission, and in healthy control subjects. Values represent mean and individual subject responses for TNF SFU (A) and SS (B) at T1, T2, and T3. T1: healthy cohort n=45, CINS n=67, septic n=103; T2: healthy cohort n=45, CINS n=55, septic n=90; T3: healthy cohort n=45, CINS n=45, septic n=77. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, as determined by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and post hoc analyses using Dunn’s test. SFU, spot-forming units.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LPS-stimulated total TNF expression at timepoint 2 is associated with in-hospital mortality. (A). Comparison of in-hospital mortality of the septic patient cohort. (B) Area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUROC) for total LPS-stimulated TNF expression in differentiating in-hospital mortality. **P < 0.01, as determined by unpaired Mann-Whitney test. AUROC=0.7572, p=0.0059.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total LPS-stimulated TNF expression at timepoint 1 is associated with discharge. (A). Comparison of favorable and non-favorable discharge patient populations in the septic patient cohort. (B) Area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUROC) for total LPS-stimulated TNF expression in differentiating favorable vs. unfavorable discharge. *P < 0.05, as determined by unpaired Mann-Whitney test. AUROC curve=0.6218, p=0.0345.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Area under the Receiver Operator Curve (AUROC) using both TNF+ and IFNγ+ on day 4 following ICU admission in differentiating 180-day mortality. A multiple Cox regression to predict survival time using both total TNF and IFNγ was conducted to construct a combined metric. When predicting 180-day mortality using the constructed metric, AUROC curve was 0.8133, 95% confidence interval was 0.7173-0.9094. p=0.0001.

References

    1. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. (2017) 43:304–77. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Srzić I, Nesek Adam V, Tunjić Pejak D. SEPSIS DEFINITION: WHAT’S NEW IN THE TREATMENT GUIDELINES. Acta Clin Croat. (2022) 61:67–72. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s1.11 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, et al. . Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. (1992) 101:1644–55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dellinger R, Zimmerman J, Taylor R, Straube R, Hauser D, Criner G, et al. . Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: results of a randomized phase II trial. Inhaled Nitric Oxide in ARDS Study Group. Crit Care Med J. (1998) 26:15–23. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00011 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chiu C, Legrand M. Epidemiology of sepsis and septic shock. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. (2021) 34:71–6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000958 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources