Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 29;42(1):603.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05290-w.

Prognostic implications and diagnostic significance of TFE3 rearrangement in renal cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Prognostic implications and diagnostic significance of TFE3 rearrangement in renal cell carcinoma

Carmina Muñoz Bastidas et al. World J Urol. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the impact of TFE3 rearrangement, analyzing clinicopathological features that influence renal cell carcinoma (RCC) recurrence, and clarify the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in diagnosis.

Methods: We screened patients diagnosed of clear cell RCC (ccRCC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on all TFE3 positive IHC tumors. Clinicopathological and survival features were collected for analysis.

Results: Out of 695 patients treated for renal tumors, 478 (68.7%) were ccRCC and 22 were suspected of TFE3 rearrangement based on IHC. Subsequent testing revealed 8 (1.15%) were positive in the FISH test (TFE3-rearranged-RCC) and 14 (2.01%) tested negative. No significant differences were noted in general characteristics among the three groups, except for age, TFE3-rearranged-RCC were younger than ccRCC (median age, 49 vs. 58 years, p=0.02). TFE3-rearranged-RCC exhibited a significant higher recurrence rate compared to ccRCC (50% vs 18.8%) and multivariate analysis revealed that TFE3 rearrangement, along with tumor size and metastasis, was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence (HR=4.6; 95% CI 1.1-21.2; p=0.05). Survival analysis demonstrated a significant shorter PFS (progression-free survival) for TFE3-rearranged-RCC compared to ccRCC.

Conclusions: TFE3 rearrangement is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and contributes to a worse PFS, suggesting the necessity of careful follow-up. Diagnosis should be confirmed using FISH due to low specificity of IHC. Further studies are needed to confirm TFE3 IHC staining as a prognostic factor.

Keywords: Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Prognosis; Renal cell carcinoma; TFE3; TFE3-rearranged-RCC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier curves. (A) Comparison of progression-free survival between TFE3-rearranged-RCC and ccRCC. (B) Comparison of overall survival between TFE3-rearranged-RCC and ccRCC

References

    1. Argani P (2015) MiT family translocation renal cell carcinoma. Semin Diagn Pathol 32:103–113. 10.1053/j.semdp.2015.02.003 - PubMed
    1. Inamura K (2017) Translocation renal cell carcinoma: an update on clinicopathological and molecular features. Cancers 9:111. 10.3390/cancers9090111 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kauffman EC, Lang M, Rais-Bahrami S, Gupta GN, Wei D, Yang Y et al (2019) Preclinical efficacy of dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor AZD8055 in renal cell carcinoma harboring a TFE3 gene fusion. BMC Cancer 19:917. 10.1186/s12885-019-6096-0 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moch H, Amin MB, Berney DM, Compérat EM, Gill AJ, Hartmann A et al (2022) The 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs—Part A: renal, Penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 82:458–468. 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.016 - PubMed
    1. Klatte T, Streubel B, Wrba F, Remzi M, Krammer B, De Martino M et al (2012) Renal cell carcinoma associated with transcription factor E3 expression and Xp11.2 translocation: incidence, characteristics, and prognosis. Am J Clin Pathol 137:761–768. 10.1309/AJCPQ6LLFMC4OXGC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources