Comparing Right-Sided Colon Adenoma and Serrated Polyp Miss Rates With Water Exchange and CO 2 Insufflation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 39471473
- DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003168
Comparing Right-Sided Colon Adenoma and Serrated Polyp Miss Rates With Water Exchange and CO 2 Insufflation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Introduction: Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers primarily occur in the right-sided colon because of missed adenomas and serrated polyps (SPs). Water exchange (WE) improves cleanliness and visibility of the right-sided colon. We hypothesized that WE could reduce the right-sided colon adenoma (rAMR) and SP miss rate (rSPMR) compared with standard colonoscopy.
Methods: We randomly assigned 386 colonoscopy patients to insertion with either WE or CO 2 insufflation. During the first withdrawal, polypectomies were performed up to the hepatic flexure. A second endoscopist, blinded to the insertion technique, re-examined the right-sided colon. The miss rate was determined by dividing the number of additional adenomas or SPs by the total number detected in both examinations. The primary outcome was the combined rAMR and rSPMR.
Results: WE significantly decreased the combined rAMR and rSPMR (22.2% vs 32.2%, P < 0.001) and rSPMR alone (22.5% vs 37.1%, P = 0.002) compared with CO 2 insufflation, but not rAMR (21.8% vs 29.8%, P = 0.079). In addition, WE significantly increased the detection of SP per colonoscopy (SP per colonoscopy) in the right-sided colon (0.95 ± 1.56 vs 0.50 ± 0.79, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ≥2 SPs in the right-sided colon were an independent predictor of rSPMR (odds ratio, 3.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.89─6.38), along with a higher right-sided colon Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.32─0.94).
Discussion: The significant reduction in rSPMR and increase in right-sided colon SP per colonoscopy suggest that colonoscopy insertion using WE is a valid alternative to CO 2 insufflation (clinical trial registration number: NCT04124393).
Keywords: colonoscopy; miss rate; right-sided colon; serrated polyp; water exchange.
Copyright © 2024 by The American College of Gastroenterology.
References
-
- Schottinger JE, Jensen CD, Ghai NR, et al. Association of physician adenoma detection rates with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. JAMA 2022;327(21):2114–22.
-
- Wieszczy P, Bugajski M, Januszewicz W, et al. Comparison of quality measures for detection of neoplasia at screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023;21(1):200–9.e6.
-
- Anderson JC, Hisey W, Mackenzie TA, et al. Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rates and risk for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: Data from the New Hampshire colonoscopy registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2022;96(2):310–7.
-
- Van Toledo DEFWM, IJspeert JEG, Bossuyt PMM, et al. Serrated polyp detection and risk of interval post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer: A population-based study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022;7(8):747–54.
-
- Zessner-Spitzenberg J, Waldmann E, Jiricka L, et al. Comparison of adenoma detection rate and proximal serrated polyp detection rate and their effect on post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer mortality in screening patients. Endoscopy 2023;55(5):434–41.