Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches
- PMID: 3947185
- DOI: 10.1001/archinte.146.2.259
Central vein catheterization. Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches
Abstract
We prospectively studied the results of 714 attempts at central venous catheterization during an eight-month period in our intensive care department. We compared the rates of failure of catheterization and early complications among three percutaneous approaches: subclavian, anterior jugular, and posterior jugular veins. The procedures were performed by experienced staff or resident physicians and inexperienced interns and residents under teaching supervision. Overall rates of failure and complication were similar for each percutaneous approach within each group of physicians. Overall failure rate was 10.1% for the experienced group and 19.4% for the inexperienced. The complication was 5.4% for experienced and 11% for inexperienced. Among inexperienced physicians, the success rate was 86.7% and the complication rate 7.6% in unconscious patients, whereas in conscious patients these rates were 70.5% and 13.8%, respectively. The inexperienced physicians caused fewer complications in mechanically ventilated than in spontaneously breathing patients. We suggest that inexperienced physicians should first attempt central vein catheterizations in unconscious and mechanically ventilated patients.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous central venous catheterization performed by medical house officers: a prospective study.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982;8(1):23-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810080105. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982. PMID: 7060113
-
Percutaneous subclavian central venous catheterization in children and adolescents: success, complications and related factors.J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007 Jan-Feb;83(1):64-70. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1583. Epub 2007 Jan 24. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2007. PMID: 17279286
-
Hemopericardium resulting from attempted internal jugular vein catheterization: a case report and review of complications of central venous catheterization.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1986;9(4):214-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02577945. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1986. PMID: 3094954
-
Is long-axis view superior to short-axis view in ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization?Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):832-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000823. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25517477 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Venepuncture, catheterization and failure to position correctly during central venous cannulation.Resuscitation. 1983 Aug;10(4):259-70. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(83)90028-x. Resuscitation. 1983. PMID: 6316446
Cited by
-
Inadvertent arterial puncture involving the subclavian artery and the aorta during central venous catheterization: a case report.J Med Case Rep. 2021 May 28;15(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s13256-021-02871-w. J Med Case Rep. 2021. PMID: 34044882 Free PMC article.
-
Malposition of central venous catheter in the jugular venous arch via external jugular vein -a case report.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr;68(2):175-8. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.175. Epub 2015 Mar 30. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015. PMID: 25844137 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound-guided central vascular interventions, comments on the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology guidelines on interventional ultrasound.J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):E851-E868. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.49. J Thorac Dis. 2016. PMID: 27747022 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Seeing is believing: ultrasound guidance for central venous access in clinical anesthesia.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012 Aug;63(2):101-2. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.101. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012. PMID: 22949974 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The unit of analysis error in studies about physicians' patient care behavior.J Gen Intern Med. 1992 Nov-Dec;7(6):623-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02599201. J Gen Intern Med. 1992. PMID: 1453246
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical