Regression and growth rates in androgen deprivation therapy for advanced castration-sensitive prostate cancer
- PMID: 39472345
- DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05316-3
Regression and growth rates in androgen deprivation therapy for advanced castration-sensitive prostate cancer
Abstract
Purpose: No study has compared cancer regression (d) and growth (g) rates in patients with advanced castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) treated with androgen deprivation therapy. The comparison of d and g rates provides insight into the differential impact of ADT regimens on tumor dynamics, potentially guiding more personalized treatment strategies. Therefore, we aimed to estimate these rates and evaluate their impact on survival outcomes.
Methods: Sequential prostate-specific antigen (PSA) data was obtained from the KYUCOG-1401 trial including patients with advanced CSPC randomized to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist (group A) and GnRH agonist plus bicalutamide (group B). d and g rates were estimated by applying mathematical models and were compared in subgroups. PSA-progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared by lower and higher than the median of these rates.
Results: Patients with higher PSA and higher extent of disease score at enrollment presented higher d rates (0.03965 vs. 0.03546, p = 0.0006) and (0.03947 vs. 0.03587, p = 0.0113) for groups A and B, respectively. The median d rate was lower for group A than group B (0.03306 vs. 0.039965, respectively [p = 0.0002]). The median g rate was higher for group A than group B (0.00016 vs. 0.00002, respectively [p = 0.0014]). The g rate, but not the d rate discriminated PSA-PFS, rPFS, and OS.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that GnRH agonist plus bicalutamide reduced PSA level faster and suppressed PSA rising longer than GnRH antagonist. Moreover, measuring the g rate can predict PSA-PFS, rPFS, and OS in patients with advanced CPSC treated with androgen deprivation therapy. These findings suggest that incorporating g rate measurements into clinical practice could improve prognostic accuracy and guide treatment decisions in advanced CSPC.
Keywords: Castration-sensitive prostate cancer; Combined androgen blockade; GnRH antagonist; Growth rate; Regression rate.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Blas L, Shiota M, Eto M (2022) Current status and future perspective on the management of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 32:100606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100606 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Swami U, Sinnott JA, Haaland B, Sayegh N, McFarland TR, Tripathi N et al (2021) Treatment pattern and outcomes with systemic therapy in men with metastatic prostate cancer in the real-World patients in the United States. Cancers (Basel) 13(19):4951. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13194951 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2020 update: treatment of relapsing and metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 79(2):263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.046 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wilkerson J, Abdallah K, Hugh-Jones C, Curt G, Rothenberg M, Simantov R et al (2017) Estimation of tumour regression and growth rates during treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 18(1):143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30633-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Leuva H, Sigel K, Zhou M, Wilkerson J, Wilkerson J, Aggen DH, Park YA et al (2019) A novel approach to assess real-world efficacy of cancer therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. Analysis of national data on Veterans treated with abiraterone and enzalutamide. Semin Oncol 46(4–5):351–361. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
