Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr;12(2):998-1012.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15082. Epub 2024 Oct 29.

The in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

The in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis

Gianluca Di Pietro et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

There is a need to address the evidence gap regarding the in-hospital administration of sacubitril/valsartan in acute myocardial infarction patients. After searching MEDLINE, Google Scholars and Scopus, a random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the in-hospital administration of the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNis) versus the standard therapy in patients with reduced heart failure due to myocardial infarction was performed. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events. All-cause mortality, cardiac death, rehospitalization for heart failure, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular volumes, N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide and adverse events were the secondary endpoints. Nine studies (eight randomized controlled trials and one echo-substudy) with a total 6597 individuals (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker: 3300 patients vs. ARNis: 3297 patients) were included for quantitative analysis. Median follow-up was 6 months. Patients receiving an in-hospital coadministration of ARNi had a lower risk of major cardiovascular event [odds ratio (OR) 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.63, P < 0.0001] and lower rate of repeat rehospitalization for heart failure (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.62, P < 0.0001), compared with a standard regimen. Additionally, left ventricle volumes were significantly lower in the ARNi group [left ventricular end-diastolic volume, mean difference (MD) 11.48 mL, 95% CI 6.10-16.85, P < 0.0001; left ventricular end-systolic volume, MD 7.09 mL, 95% CI 2.89-11.29, P = 0.0009] with a significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.07, 95% CI 1.61-4.53, P < 0.0001), compared with standard therapy. No significant differences were observed in terms of cardiac death, all cause of mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide. Higher rates of iatrogenic hypotensive events were observed in the ARNi group compared with the standard therapy (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.26-1.60, P value < 0.00001). In patients with acute myocardial infarction related heart failure, the in-hospital administration of ARNis was associated with a reduced risk of major cardiovascular events and re-hospitalization for heart failure, as well as cardiac remodelling, but higher rates of hypotensive events compared with standard therapy.

Keywords: acute myocardial infarction; angiotensin receptor‐neprylisin Inihibitors; heart failure; medical therapy; sacubitril; valsartan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram of the searching strategy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MACE. Primary (A) and sensitivity (B) analysis. ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
All cause of mortality. Primary (A) and sensitivity (B) analysis. ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cardiac death. Primary (A) and sensitivity (B) analysis. ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Rehospitalization for heart failure. Primary (A) and sensitivity (B) analysis. ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Non‐fatal MI. ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Left ventricular ejection fraction. Primary (A) and sensitivity (B) analysis. ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Left ventricular end‐diastolic volume (A) and left ventricular end‐systolic volume (B). ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Overall adverse events (A), hypotension (B) and renal impairment (C). ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; CI, confidence interval; M‐H, Mantel–Haensel.

References

    1. Jernberg T, Hasvold P, Henriksson M, Hjelm H, Thuresson M, Janzon M. Cardiovascular risk in post‐myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long‐term perspective. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1163‐1170. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu505 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tobbia P, Brodie BR, Witzenbichler B, Metzger C, Guagliumi G, Yu J, et al. Adverse event rates following primary PCI for STEMI at US and non‐US hospitals: three‐year analysis from the HORIZONS‐AMI trial. EuroIntervention 2013;8:1134‐1142. doi:10.4244/EIJV8I10A176 - DOI - PubMed
    1. De Filippo O, D'Ascenzo F, Wańha W, et al. IncidenCe and predictOrs of heaRt fAiLure after acute coronarY syndrome: the CORALYS registry. Int J Cardiol 2023. Jan;1:35‐42. - PubMed
    1. Bruno F, Marengo G, De Filippo O, et al. Impact of complete revascularization on development of heart failure in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease: a subanalysis of the CORALYS registry. J Am Heart Assoc 2023. Aug;12:e028475. doi:10.1161/JAHA.122.028475 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sulo G, Igland J, Vollset SE, Nygård O, Ebbing M, Sulo E, et al. Burden and timing of occurrence: a nation‐wide analysis including 86 771 patients from the cardiovascular disease in Norway (CVDNOR) project. J Am Heart Assoc 2016;5:e002667. doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002667 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources