Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 15:15:1486974.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1486974. eCollection 2024.

Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal follow-up of 15 fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome

Affiliations

Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal follow-up of 15 fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome

Yan Zhao et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

Background: The clinical phenotypes of 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome have been extensively reported in previous studies, mostly about adults and children, with limited information available on fetal cases. This study aims to explore the genotype-phenotype correlation of fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome and analyze the characteristics of prenatal diagnosis indications and provide clinical information for prenatal and postnatal genetic counseling.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3,451 pregnant women who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis for SNP array between January 2018 and December 2022 at the Jinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed on the prenatal diagnosis indications, pedigree analysis, pregnancy outcomes and postnatal follow-up of 15 fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome.

Results: SNP array revealed that 15 fetuses had duplications in the 16p13.11 region with varying prenatal diagnosis indications. Among the cases, 6/15 exhibited ultrasound abnormalities, 5/15 had abnormal chromosomal copy number variations as indicated by non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), one case involved advanced maternal age, and 3/15 had other abnormalities. 16p13.11 microduplication syndrome was closely related to ultrasound abnormalities, especially structural abnormalities and soft marker anomalies (abnormal ultrasonic soft indicators), while the indication of NIPT could improve the detection rate of copy number variations (CNVs) in this region. Only 7/15 fetuses underwent pedigree verification, with one case of de novo 16p13.11 microduplication, and the others inherited from one parent. Pregnancy was terminated in 2/15 cases and the outcome of one case is unknown due to loss to follow-up. Among the remaining cases, only one case exhibited a ventricular septal defect, while another presented with omphalocele. No other obvious abnormalities were reported postnatally.

Conclusion: The prenatal phenotypes of fetuses with 16p13.11 microduplication were highly associated with ultrasound abnormalities but lacked specificity. Comprehensive genetic tracing, outcome analysis, and follow-up are essential for providing accurate prenatal and postnatal genetic counseling.

Keywords: 16p13.11; CNVs; SNP-array; microduplication; prenatal diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
16p13.11 microduplication detected using SNP-array. SNP-array revealed 16p13.11 microduplication in fetus case1∼case15. Refer to the intervals I, II and III marked in the figure to determine the location of the 16p13.11 duplication breakpoints in 15 fetuses. Case 1, 2, 3, 8 have smaller typical duplicatons encompassed interval II, while Case 7, 15 have larger atypical duplicatons encompassed interval II and III. The breakpoints of case 4, 5 ,6, 9, 10, 13 encompassed interval I and II, and the breakpoints of case 11, 12, 14 encompassed interval I, II and III. Note: The red rectangle in the chromosome diagram marks the location of 16p13.11. The blue bars indicate the location of duplications in the 16p13.11 region for 15 fetuses. The black bars, from left to right, represent intervals I, II and III respectively. OMIM genes are also labeled, dark green indicates clinical relevant OMIM Morbid genes, and gray indicates other OMIM genes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allach El Khattabi L., Heide S., Caberg J. H., Andrieux J., Doco Fenzy M., Vincent-Delorme C., et al. (2020). 16p13.11 microduplication in 45 new patients: refined clinical significance and genotype-phenotype correlations. J. Med. Genet. 57 (5), 301–307. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105389 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Atli E. I., Yalcintepe S., Atli E., Demir S., Mail C., Gurkan H. (2022). Clinical implications of chromosome 16 copy number variation. Mol. Syndromol. 13 (3), 184–192. 10.1159/000517762 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balogh S. A., McDowell C. S., Tae Kwon Y., Denenberg V. H. (2001). Facilitated stimulus-response associative learning and long-term memory in mice lacking the NTAN1 amidase of the N-end rule pathway. Brain. Res. 892 (2), 336–343. 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)03268-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cai M., Que Y., Chen X., Chen Y., Liang B., Huang H., et al. (2022). 16p13.11 microdeletion/microduplication in fetuses: investigation of associated ultrasound phenotypes, genetic anomalies, and pregnancy outcome follow-up. Bmc. Pregnancy. Childbirth. 22 (1), 913. 10.1186/s12884-022-05267-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calderoni S., Ricca I., Balboni G., Cagiano R., Cassandrini D., Doccini S., et al. (2020). Evaluation of chromosome microarray analysis in a large cohort of females with autism spectrum disorders: a single center Italian study. J. Pers. Med. 10 (4), 160. 10.3390/jpm10040160 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources