Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Aug 23;2(9):615-630.
doi: 10.1021/cbmi.4c00030. eCollection 2024 Sep 23.

Peptide PET Imaging: A Review of Recent Developments and a Look at the Future of Radiometal-Labeled Peptides in Medicine

Affiliations
Review

Peptide PET Imaging: A Review of Recent Developments and a Look at the Future of Radiometal-Labeled Peptides in Medicine

Majed Shabsigh et al. Chem Biomed Imaging. .

Abstract

The development of peptide-based, radiometal-labeled PET imaging agents has seen an increase in attention due to the favorable properties the peptide backbone exhibits. These include high selectivity and affinity to proteins and cells directly linked to various types of cancers. In addition, rapid clearance from circulation and low toxicity allow for unique approaches to engineering a viable peptide-based imaging agent. Utilizing peptides as the backbone allows for various modifications to improve metabolic stability, target cell affinity, and image quality and imaging capabilities and reduce toxicity. Select radiolabeled peptides have already been FDA approved, with many more in late-stage trials. This review summarizes the current state of the radiometal-labeled PET peptide imaging field as well as explores methods used by researchers to modify peptides, concluding with a look at the future of peptide-based therapy and diagnostics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(Top) General application of a peptide-based molecular probe with an imaging or therapeutic radioisotope. These probes can be modified for many purposes. Shown is the schematic of a generic probe with each section color coded. (Bottom) For each section, two different modifications are shown to highlight the diversity of possible combinations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UR-LS130 peptide with an amino acid structure of MRRPYIL. The Tyr residue has a β–β demethylated R group which was found to have the highest in vivo stability and afforded a high tumor-to-muscle ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PET/CT Imaging of NENs using 68Ga-DOTA-NOC (A, B) and 18F-FDG (C). With the 68Ga-DOTA-NOC imaging agent, we see three distinct areas of increased radiotracer uptake (indicated by the blue and white arrows in A and B, respectively) but no increased uptake of the 18F-FDG (C). Reprinted with permission from ref (43). Copyright 2003 Oxford Academic.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Structure of CM-2 peptide. CM-2 contains a 6-aminohexanoic acid linker group between the DOTA chelator and the peptide backbone. This linker has shown an increase in in vivo stability when compared to non-Ahx CM-2 peptides.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Use of the [64Cu]WL12 peptide to image tumor PD-L1 expression in vivo. This figure shows NSG mice with hPD-L1 (red arrow) and CHO tumors (blue arrow) being intravenously given 150 μCi of the [64Cu]WL12 tracer. Images were taken 10, 30, 60, and 120 min after injection. Specific accumulation of [64Cu]WL12 is shown. Reprinted with permission from ref (99). Copyright 2008 Springer Nature.
Figure 6
Figure 6
SARTATE peptide structure. [64Cu]SARTATE utilizes the MeCOSar chelator for 64Cu binding. The phenylalanine and tryptophan amino acid residues are in the d configuration, a technique to increase peptide stability. A S–S bridge is also seen between the two cystine residues.
Figure 7
Figure 7
l/d-Amino acid comparison.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Cyclic RGD pentapeptide.

References

    1. Rajwa P.; Pfister D.; Rieger C.; Heidenreich J.; Drzezga A.; Persigehl T.; Shariat S. F.; Heidenreich A. Importance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-CT in Patients Treated with Salvage Radical Prostatectomy for Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer. Prostate 2023, 83 (4), 385–391. 10.1002/pros.24470. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jacobson F. L.; Van den Abbeele A. D. Importance of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for Detection of Cancer. Radiology 2022, 303 (1), 200–201. 10.1148/radiol.212884. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morigi J. J.; Anderson J.; Fanti S. Promise of PET Imaging in Prostate Cancer: Improvement or Waste of Money?. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2020, 30 (1), 9. 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000684. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van de Donk P. P.; Oosting S. F.; Knapen D. G.; van der Wekken A. J.; Brouwers A. H.; Lub-de Hooge M. N.; de Groot D.-J. A.; de Vries E. G. Molecular Imaging to Support Cancer Immunotherapy. J. Immunother Cancer 2022, 10 (8), e004949 10.1136/jitc-2022-004949. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lother D.; Robert M.; Elwood E.; Smith S.; Tunariu N.; Johnston S. R. D.; Parton M.; Bhaludin B.; Millard T.; Downey K.; Sharma B. Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer, CT, PET/CT, MRI, WB-DWI, CCA: Review and New Perspectives. Cancer Imaging 2023, 23 (1), 53. 10.1186/s40644-023-00557-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources