Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Feb 14;46(7):635-645.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae784.

Comparison of strategies for vascular ACCESS closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: the ACCESS-TAVI randomized trial

Tobias Rheude  1 , Hendrik Ruge  2 , Niklas Altaner  1 , Costanza Pellegrini  1 , Hector Alvarez Covarrubias  1   3 , Patrick Mayr  4 , Salvatore Cassese  1 , Sebastian Kufner  1   5 , Yousuke Taniguchi  1 , Christian Thilo  6 , Markus Klos  7 , Magdalena Erlebach  2 , Simon Schneider  8 , Martin Jurisic  1 , Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz  5   9 , Rüdiger Lange  2 , Heribert Schunkert  1   5 , Adnan Kastrati  1   5 , Markus Krane  2   5 , Erion Xhepa  1 , Michael Joner  1   5
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of strategies for vascular ACCESS closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: the ACCESS-TAVI randomized trial

Tobias Rheude et al. Eur Heart J. .

Abstract

Background and aims: Data from randomized trials investigating different access closure strategies after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) remain scarce. In this study, two vascular closure device (VCD) strategies to achieve haemostasis after TF-TAVI were compared.

Methods: The ACCESS-TAVI (Comparison of Strategies for Vascular ACCESS Closure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is a prospective, multicentre trial in which patients undergoing TF-TAVI were randomly assigned to a strategy with a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy (suture/plug group) using one ProGlide™/ProStyle™ (Abbott Vascular) and one Angio-Seal® (Terumo) vs. a suture-based VCD strategy (suture-only group) using two ProGlides™/ProStyles™. The primary endpoint was a composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications during index hospitalization according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. Key secondary endpoints included time to haemostasis, bleeding type ≥ 2, and all-cause mortality over 30 days.

Results: Between September 2022 and April 2024, 454 patients were randomized. The primary endpoint occurred in 27% (62/230) in the suture/plug group and 54% (121/224) in the suture-only group [relative risk .55 (95% confidence interval: .44, .68); P < .001]. Time to haemostasis was significantly shorter in the suture/plug group compared with the suture-only group (108 ± 208 s vs. 206 ± 171 s; P < .001). At 30 days, bleeding type ≥ 2 occurred less often in the suture/plug group compared with the suture-only group [6.2% vs. 12.1%, relative risk .66 (.43, 1.02); P = .032], with no significant difference in mortality.

Conclusions: With regard to the composite of major or minor access site-related vascular complications, a combined suture-/plug-based VCD strategy was superior to a suture-based VCD strategy for vascular access closure in patients undergoing TF-TAVI.

Keywords: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation; Vascular closure devices; Vascular complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources