Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;68(2):433-443.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06310-5. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

Characterising impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and associated risks through HypoA-Q: findings from a T1D Exchange cohort

Affiliations

Characterising impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia and associated risks through HypoA-Q: findings from a T1D Exchange cohort

Yu Kuei Lin et al. Diabetologia. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: We aimed to: (1) externally validate the five-item Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire (HypoA-Q) impaired awareness subscale (HypoA-Q IA); (2) examine how impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) relates to the risk of severe hypoglycaemia and level 2 hypoglycaemia; and (3) identify factors associated with IAH.

Methods: Nationwide survey of T1D Exchange registrants was conducted to collect data on demographics, 6 month severe-hypoglycaemia history, hypoglycaemia awareness status (via HypoA-Q IA, the Gold instrument and the Clarke instrument) and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) measures. The Clarke hypoglycaemia awareness factor (Clarke-HAF) was calculated to exclude severe-hypoglycaemia history items. Analyses included Cronbach's α, Spearman correlations and logistic regression.

Results: Valid survey responses were collected from N=1580 adults with type 1 diabetes (median age, 44 years; 52% female participants; median HbA1c, 48 mmol/mol [6.5%]). Of these, 94% of participants were using CGMs and 69% were using hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems; 30% had at least one severe-hypoglycaemia episode in the past 6 months. The HypoA-Q IA had satisfactory internal reliability (α=0.79) and construct validity. Higher HypoA-Q IA scores were independently associated with greater risk of severe hypoglycaemia (p<0.001), performing comparably to the Gold instrument and the Clarke-HAF instrument. HypoA-Q IA-determined IAH was independently associated with 88% higher odds of developing severe hypoglycaemia (p<0.001) and twofold higher odds for spending ≥1% of time in level 2 hypoglycaemia (p=0.011). Higher age and longer diabetes duration were associated with higher IAH risk (p<0.001). CGM and HCL use was associated with lower IAH risk (p<0.001).

Conclusions/interpretation: The HypoA-Q IA is a brief, valid and reliable tool for assessing IAH in today's technology-oriented era. IAH was independently associated with severe hypoglycaemia and level 2 hypoglycaemia in a cohort with high prevalence of advanced diabetes technology use and HbA1c within the recommended range. CGM and HCL use was related to lower IAH risk.

Keywords: Continuous glucose monitors; HypoA-Q; Hypoglycaemia; Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia; Type 1 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Acknowledgements: We greatly appreciate the support from the T1D Exchange and all the study participants for completing this study. The study described in the manuscript was accepted for an oral presentation at the 2024 American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions. Data availability: Data are available on request to YKL (yuklin@med.umich.edu). Funding: This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK129724), and Michigan Center for Clinical and Translational Research (P30DK092926). MRR is supported in part by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases U01DK135120. REDCap was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR00240). Authors' relationships and activities: JS owns the copyright of the HypoA-Q. The other authors declare that there are no other relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work. Contribution statement: YKL, AMM, AJF, JAMS, MRR, SAA and JS were involved in the conception, design and interpretation of the results. YKL, EH and AA were involved in the data collection. YKL and WY were involved in the analysis. YKL wrote the first draft of the manuscript and is the guarantor of this work. All authors edited, reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC-AUCs for predicting severe-hypoglycaemia events comparing Gold, Clarke-full, Clarke-HAF and HypoA-Q IA scores. The grey dashed line is a reference line, corresponding to the ROC of a classifier that predicts the class at random

References

    1. Cryer PE (2008) The barrier of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes 57:3169–3176. 10.2337/db08-1084 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cranston I, Lomas J, Maran A, Macdonald I, Amiel SA (1994) Restoration of hypoglycaemia awareness in patients with long-duration insulin-dependent diabetes. Lancet 344:283–287. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91336-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rickels MR, Peleckis AJ, Markmann E et al. (2016) Long-term improvement in glucose control and counterregulation by islet transplantation for type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:4421–4430. 10.1210/jc.2016-1649 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rodbard D (2016) Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Diabetes Technol Ther 18(Suppl 2):S3–S13. 10.1089/dia.2015.0417 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rickels MR, Peleckis AJ, Dalton-Bakes C et al. (2018) Continuous glucose monitoring for hypoglycemia avoidance and glucose counterregulation in long-standing type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:105–114. 10.1210/jc.2017-01516 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources