Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Single-injection Erector Spinae Plane Block, Retrolaminar Block, and Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Single-incision Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A 3-arm, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial
- PMID: 39477915
- DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001259
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Single-injection Erector Spinae Plane Block, Retrolaminar Block, and Paravertebral Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Single-incision Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A 3-arm, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial
Abstract
Objective: Effective postoperative analgesia is critical for thoracic surgery. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), retrolaminar block (RLB), and paravertebral block (TPVB) in single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SITS).
Methods: Seventy-six patients underwent general anesthesia followed by ultrasound-guided nerve blocks with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes included the area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) scores during rest and coughing over 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid use, plasma biomarkers, and postoperative recovery measures.
Results: The AUC for NRS was 107.8±10.53 in the ESPB group, 104.8±8.05 in the RLB group, and 103.6±10.42 in the TPVB group, demonstrating noninferiority for ESPB (difference: 4.2±3.0, 95% CI: -1.82 to 10.22) and RLB (difference: 1.2±2.6, 95% CI: -3.97 to 6.37) compared with TPVB. No statistically significant differences were observed in opioid use, plasma biomarkers, QoR-15 scores, or adverse events.
Discussion: ESPB and RLB provide noninferior analgesia compared with TPVB in SITS patients and are effective alternatives that enhance safety.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
This research was supported by Science and Technology Department of Yunnan Province project fund (Grant NO.202101AY070001-133, 202401AY070001-230). The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Marshall K, McLaughlin K. Pain management in thoracic surgery. Thorac surg clin. 2020;30:339–346.
-
- Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Brit J Anaesth. 2006;96:418–426.
-
- Lönnqvist PA, MacKenzie J, Soni AK, et al. Paravertebral blockade. Failure rate and complications. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:813–815.
-
- Naja Z, Lönnqvist PA. Somatic paravertebral nerve blockade. Incidence of failed block and complications. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:1184–1188.
-
- D’Ercole F, Arora H, Kumar PA. Paravertebral block for thoracic surgery. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesth. 2018;32:915–927.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
