Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 16:11:1491358.
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1491358. eCollection 2024.

Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Affiliations

Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Mikhail Ya Yadgarov et al. Front Med (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Background: With machine learning (ML) carving a niche in diverse medical disciplines, its role in sepsis prediction, a condition where the 'golden hour' is critical, is of paramount interest. This study assesses the factors influencing the efficacy of ML models in sepsis prediction, aiming to optimize their use in clinical practice.

Methods: We searched Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, and CENTRAL for studies published from inception to October 2023. We focused on studies predicting sepsis in real-time settings in adult patients in any hospital settings without language limits. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic. This meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA-NMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A Network Meta-Analysis using the CINeMA approach compared ML models against traditional scoring systems, with meta-regression identifying factors affecting model quality.

Results: From 3,953 studies, 73 articles encompassing 457,932 septic patients and 256 models were analyzed. The pooled AUC for ML models was 0.825 and it significantly outperformed traditional scoring systems. Neural Network and Decision Tree models demonstrated the highest AUC metrics. Significant factors influencing AUC included ML model type, dataset type, and prediction window.

Conclusion: This study establishes the superiority of ML models, especially Neural Network and Decision Tree types, in sepsis prediction. It highlights the importance of model type and dataset characteristics for prediction accuracy, emphasizing the necessity for standardized reporting and validation in ML healthcare applications. These findings call for broader clinical implementation to evaluate the effectiveness of these models in diverse patient groups.

Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-12-0062/, identifier, INPLASY2023120062.

Keywords: decision trees; machine learning; network meta-analysis; neural networks; sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram for study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Network plot. DT, Decision Tree; NNM, Neural Network Model; SVM, Support Vector Machine; LR, Logistic Regression; NB, Naïve Bayes; GLM, Generalized Linear Model; KNN, K-Nearest Neighbors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Network meta-analysis summary forest plot for predictive efficacy of various ML models and best of scoring system used for sepsis prediction.

References

    1. Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NKJ, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, et al. . Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis current estimates and limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2016) 193:259–72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. (2021) 47:1181–247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rababa M, Hamad DB, Hayajneh AA. Sepsis assessment and management in critically ill adults: a systematic review. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0270711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270711, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Il KH, Park S. Sepsis: early recognition and optimized treatment. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). (2019) 82:6–14. doi: 10.4046/trd.2018.0041, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Im Y, Kang D, Ko RE, Lee YJ, Lim SY, Park S, et al. . Time-to-antibiotics and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study. Crit Care. (2022) 26:19. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03883-0, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources