Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024;12(10):683-689.
doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2024.78869.3622.

Pre-Operative Traction in Femoral Fractures for Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Review

Pre-Operative Traction in Femoral Fractures for Pain Management: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

Jean Tarchichi et al. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024.

Abstract

Objectives: This meta-analysis studies and assesses the pain relief effect of different pre-operative traction systems in proximal and femoral shaft fractures as this subject is still debated and no clear guidelines are established.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar (page 1-20) were searched until January 2024. The clinical outcomes collected consisted of pain scales following traction.

Results: Two randomized clinical trials were included to compare skeletal (72 patients) to skin traction (80 patients) and eight randomized clinical trials with one prospective study were included to compare traction (457 patients) versus no traction (439 patients). Our results revealed no differences in terms of post-operative pain VAS between both the skeletal and skin traction as well as between traction and no traction.

Conclusion: No added benefit of traction was observed when pain relief is the main consideration. Furthermore, with their different potential complications, systematic pre-operative traction should not be implemented in all femoral fractures.

Keywords: Femoral shaft fracture; Hip fracture; Intertrochanteric fracture; Skeletal traction; Skin traction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) do NOT have any potential conflicts of interest for this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart for article selection process
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A): Risk of bias item for each included study. (B) Risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot showing the pain after traction in skin traction and skeletal traction
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot showing the pain after traction in the traction group and group without traction

References

    1. Manafi Rasi A, Amoozadeh F, Khani S, Kamrani Rad A, Sazegar A. The Effect of Skin Traction on Preoperative Pain and Need for Analgesics in Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Arch Trauma Res. 2015;4(2):20–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daher M, Tarchichi J, Zalaquett Z, Casey JC, Ghanimeh J, Mansour J. Antegrade vs Retrograde Intra-Medullary Nailing in Femoral Shaft Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(8):535–545. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amer KM, Congiusta D V, Smith B, et al. Cephalomedullary Nailing has a Higher Reoperation Rate Compared to Sliding Hip Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Arch bone Jt Surg. 2023;11(10):595–604. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernstein DN, Davis JT, Fairbanks C, McWilliam-Ross K, Ring D, Sanchez HB. Lower Bone Mineral Density is Associated with Intertrochanteric Hip Fracture. Arch bone Jt Surg. 2018;6(6):517–522. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hussain Z, Raza S, Momin A, Ali N. Comparison of mean pain score by applying with and without skin traction in patients with hip fracture. Pakistan J Med Heal Sci. 2015;9(1):185–188.

LinkOut - more resources