Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Oct 1;101(10):619-626.
doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002187.

Baseline factors associated with myopia progression and axial elongation over 30 months in children 5 to 12 years of age

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Baseline factors associated with myopia progression and axial elongation over 30 months in children 5 to 12 years of age

Katherine K Weise et al. Optom Vis Sci. .

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify baseline factors associated with greater myopia progression and axial elongation in children with myopia.

Methods: This study performed a post hoc analysis of data from a 30-month randomized trial of atropine 0.01% versus placebo in children 5 to <13 years old with baseline spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) of -1.00 to -6.00 D, astigmatism of ≤1.50 D, and anisometropia of <1.00 D SER. Data from atropine 0.01% and placebo groups were pooled given outcomes were similar. Baseline factors of age, SER, axial length, race, sex, parental myopia, and iris color were evaluated for association with changes in SER and with changes in axial length at 30 months (24 months on treatment and then 6 months off) using backward model selection.

Results: Among 187 randomized participants, 175 (94%) completed 30 months of follow-up. The mean change in SER was greater among younger children (-0.19 D per 1 year younger; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.25 to -0.14 D; p<0.001) and children with higher myopia (-0.14 D per 1 D more myopia at baseline; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.05 D; p=0.002). The mean change in axial length was also greater among younger children (0.13 mm per 1 year younger; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.15 mm; p<0.001) and children with higher baseline myopia (0.04 mm per 1 D more myopia; 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.08; p=0.04).

Conclusions: Younger children with higher myopia had greater myopic progression and axial elongation over 30 months than older children with lower myopia. Developing effective treatments to slow the faster myopic progression in younger children should be a target of further research.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03334253.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding organizations.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Adjusted Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error and Axial Length at 30 Months by Age and Baseline Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error
Mean change in spherical equivalent refractive error (A) and axial length (B) from baseline to 30 months adjusted for treatment group (A and B) and baseline axial length (B only). The subgroups were defined by dichotomizing age at enrollment and baseline spherical equivalent refractive error. Younger age was defined as 5 to <10.2 years and older age was defined as 10.2 to <13 years. Higher myopia was defined as −2.75 to −6.00 D and lower myopia was defined as −1.00 to myopia less than −2.75 D. The middle dot represents the mean and the error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. SER = spherical equivalent refractive error.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error and Axial Length at 30 Months by Age and Baseline Myopia
Scatterplots of change in spherical equivalent refractive error from baseline to 30 months (A, B) and change in axial length from baseline to 30 months (C, D) versus baseline spherical equivalent refractive error (A, C) and age at randomization (B, D). The line of best fit (least squares) is shown in blue and the Pearson correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval is shown in red. SER = spherical equivalent refractive error.

References

    1. National Eye Institute. Nearsightedness (Myopia) Tables. Updated February 7, 2020. Accessed June 2, 2022. https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-health-data-and-stati...
    1. Tailor PD, Xu TT, Tailor S, Asheim C, Olsen TW. Trends in myopia and high myopia from 1966 to 2019 in Olmsted county, Minnesota. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023;259:35–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haarman AEG, Enthoven CA, Tideman JWL, Tedja MS, Verhoeven VJM, Klaver CCW. The complications of myopia: A review and meta-analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(4):49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kleinstein RN, Sinnott LT, Jones-Jordan LA, Sims J, Zadnik K. New cases of myopia in children. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(10):1274–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Group COMET. Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(13):7871–84. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data