Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 31;15(1):89.
doi: 10.1186/s13293-024-00666-4.

Sex dimorphism and tissue specificity of gene expression changes in aging mice

Affiliations

Sex dimorphism and tissue specificity of gene expression changes in aging mice

Dantong Zhu et al. Biol Sex Differ. .

Abstract

Background: Aging is a complex process that involves all tissues in an organism and shows sex dimorphism. While transcriptional changes in aging have been well characterized, the majority of studies have focused on a single sex and sex differences in gene expression in aging are poorly understood. In this study, we explore sex dimorphism in gene expression in aging mice across three tissues.

Methods: We collected gastrocnemius muscle, liver and white adipose tissue from young (6 months, n = 14) and old (24 months, n = 14) female and male C57BL/6NIA mice and performed RNA-seq. To investigate sex dimorphism in aging, we considered two levels of comparisons: (a) differentially expressed genes between females and males in the old age group and (b) comparisons between females and males across the aging process. We utilized differential expression analysis and gene feature selection to investigate candidate genes. Gene set enrichment analysis was performed to identify candidate molecular pathways. Furthermore, we performed a co-expression network analysis and chose the gene module(s) associated with aging independent of sex or tissue-type.

Results: We identified both tissue-specific and tissue-independent genes associated with sex dimorphism in aged mice. Unique differentially expressed genes between old males and females across tissues were mainly enriched for pathways related to specific tissue function. We found similar results when exploring sex differences in the aging process, with the exception that in the liver genes enriched for lipid metabolism and digestive system were identified in both females and males. Combining enriched pathways across analyses, we identified amino acid metabolism, digestive system, and lipid metabolism as the core mechanisms of sex dimorphism in aging. Although the vast majority of age-related genes were sex and tissue specific, we identified 127 hub genes contributing to aging independent of sex and tissue that were enriched for the immune system and signal transduction.

Conclusions: There are clear sex differences in gene expression in aging across liver, muscle and white adipose. Core pathways, including amino acid metabolism, digestive system and lipid metabolism, contribute to sex differences in aging.

Keywords: Adipose tissue; Aging; Co-expression network analysis; Feature selection; Gene expression; Liver; Mice; Muscle; Sex dimorphism; Tissue-specific.

Plain language summary

Aging is a complex process that occurs differently across tissues, and in men compared to women. However, the mechanisms that cause sex differences are not well understood. Using naturally aging mouse models we compared how specific genes were differently expressed in muscle, liver and fat of old and young female and male mice. We found that the vast majority of genes that were changed with age were only changed in one sex and specific tissues. Overall, sex differences in aging across tissues were related to genes involved in amino acid metabolism, digestive system and lipid metabolism. Notably, lipid metabolism is important in aging females across all tissues. We also identified a set of genes associated with aging independent of sex and tissue-type involved in immune pathways and signaling. These results enhance our understanding of sex differences in aging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.A.S. is a founder, equity owner, advisor to, director of, board member of, consultant to, investor in and/or inventor on patents licensed to Revere Biosensors, UpRNA, GlaxoSmithKline, Wellomics, DaVinci Logic, InsideTracker (Segterra), Caudalie, Animal Biosciences, Longwood Fund, Catalio Capital Management, Frontier Acquisition Corporation, AFAR (American Federation for Aging Research), Life Extension Advocacy Foundation (LEAF), Cohbar, Galilei, EMD Millipore, Zymo Research, Immetas, Bayer Crop Science, EdenRoc Sciences (and affiliates Arc-Bio, Dovetail Genomics, Claret Bioscience, MetroBiotech, Astrea, Liberty Biosecurity and Delavie), Life Biosciences, Alterity, ATAI Life Sciences, Levels Health, Tally (aka Longevity Sciences) and Bold Capital. D.A.S. is an inventor on a patent application filed by Mayo Clinic and Harvard Medical School that has been licensed to Elysium Health. Additional info on D.A.S. affiliations can be found at https://sinclair.hms.harvard.edu/david-sinclairs-affiliations. After contributing to this work, A.M assumed a role as scientific editor for Cell Metabolism, Cell Press. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic figure showing the workflow of the study. Blue dots represent female samples and yellow dots represent male samples
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Differential expression analysis results for males and females in the old age group. The differential analysis was performed by using the limma-voom pipeline, which included tissue, sex and age group as factors in the design. Differentially expressed genes between females and males in the old age group were defined as genes that present absolute Fold Change greater than log2(1.5) by t-test relative to a threshold with adjusted p-value less than 0.05. Volcano plots show the up- (blue) and down- (green) regulated genes when comparing female to male samples in three types of tissues, gastrocnemius muscle (A), liver (B), and white adipose tissue (C). Genes that were not determined as DEGs are colored in gray. By combining three sets of DEGs, we generated an Upset plot (D) showing intersecting sets, with five genes shared across the three DEG sets. Unique DEG sets were subjected to gene set enrichment analysis, and top ten pathways that were overrepresented and showed the least adjusted p-values were plotted for gastrocnemius muscle (E), liver (F), and white adipose tissue (G), respectively. The position of the dot at the x-axis shows the number of genes within the unique DEG set, color indicates the significance level and size represents the gene ratio in the complete gene set of the pathway
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sex differences in aging in terms of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The differential analysis was performed by using the limma-voom pipeline, which included tissues, sex and age group as factors in the design. DEGs under two conditions (comparisons of the old to the young group in either males or females) were defined as genes that present absolute Fold Change greater than log2(1.5) by t-test relative to a threshold with adjusted p-value less than 0.05. The scatter plots show logFCs of all the genes in female and male comparison pairs. DEGs that were unique in females are colored in blue, with yellow for unique male DEGs and green triangle for common DEGs, in three types of tissues, gastrocnemius muscle (A), liver (B), and white adipose tissue (C). Genes that were not determined as DEGs are colored in gray. By combining the above six sets of DEGs, we generated an Upset plot (D) showing intersecting sets. E The shared DEGs across males and females for liver (n = 37) were subjected to gene set enrichment analysis, and top ten pathways that were overrepresented and showed the least adjusted p-values were plotted. The position of the dot at the x-axis shows the number of genes within the DEG set, color indicates the significance level and size represents the gene ratio in the complete gene set of the pathway
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
List of 21 enriched KEGG pathways from identified differentially expressed gene (DEG) lists. DEG lists were derived from differential expression analysis in gastrocnemius muscle (Mus), liver (Liv), and white adipose tissue (Wat) from either comparing females to males in the old age group (labeled Sex diff. in aged mice) or unique sex specific genes in aging (comparing the old to young age group) (labeled Female or Male spe. in aging). Enriched KEGG pathways were determined by the overrepresentation of genes by Fisher’s exact test, where adjusted p-values were calculated using the Benjamini–Hochberg method and cutoff at 0.05 was applied. KEGG pathways that were detected in more than one gene set were obtained. The green dots represent the presence of the pathway within the enrichment analysis of the gene list. *The pathway was only detected in one type of tissue
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Gene module associated with aging. Gene co-expression network analysis was performed based on gene expression levels for somatic chromosome-related genes (n = 15,932) from all 56 samples, regardless of tissue and sex. The analysis resulted in 7 gene modules (A). Within each module, a co-expression network was derived and the first principal component of gene expression was denoted as module eigenvalue. B Forest plot shows the associations of eigenvalue of each module with age group and ME4 presented significant association with age group regardless of sex. Based on gene significance (correlation coefficient between gene expression level and age group) and module membership, hub genes were selected (C). These hub genes were then subjected to gene set enrichment analysis, and top ten pathways that were overrepresented and showed the least adjusted p-values were plotted (D). The position of the dot at the x-axis shows the number of genes within the DEG set, color indicates the significance level and size represents the gene ratio in the complete gene set of the pathway

References

    1. Harman D. The aging process: major risk factor for disease and death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:5360–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Troen BR. The biology of aging. Mt Sinai J Med. 2003;70:3–22. - PubMed
    1. Jin K, Simpkins JW, Ji X, Leis M, Stambler I. The critical need to promote research of aging and aging-related diseases to improve health and longevity of the elderly population. Aging Dis. 2015;6:1–5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le Couteur DG, Thillainadesan J. What is an aging-related disease? An epidemiological perspective. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022;77:2168–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186:243–78. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources