Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 Feb 6:2024.10.25.620315.
doi: 10.1101/2024.10.25.620315.

Palmitoylated Importin α Regulates Mitotic Spindle Orientation Through Interaction with NuMA

Affiliations

Palmitoylated Importin α Regulates Mitotic Spindle Orientation Through Interaction with NuMA

Patrick James Sutton et al. bioRxiv. .

Update in

Abstract

Regulation of cell division orientation is a fundamental process critical to differentiation and tissue homeostasis. Microtubules emanating from the mitotic spindle pole bind a conserved complex of proteins at the cell cortex which orients the spindle and ultimately the cell division plane. Control of spindle orientation is of particular importance in developing tissues, such as the developing brain. Misorientation of the mitotic spindle and thus subsequent division plane misalignment can contribute to improper segregation of cell fate determinants in developing neuroblasts, leading to a rare neurological disorder known as microcephaly. We demonstrate that the nuclear transport protein importin α, when palmitoylated, plays a critical role in mitotic spindle orientation through localizing factors, such as NuMA, to the cell cortex. We also observe craniofacial developmental defects in Xenopus laevis when importin α palmitoylation is abrogated, including smaller head and brains, a hallmark of spindle misorientation and microcephaly. These findings characterize not only a role for importin α in spindle orientation, but also a broader role for importin α palmitoylation which has significance for many cellular processes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Palmitoylation Mediated Cortical Localization of Importin α and Importin α Cargo Binding are Required for Proper Mitotic Spindle Orientation.
A) Immunofluorescence images of importin α localization in metaphase-arrested (refer to Materials & Methods) HCT116 cells incubated for 1 hour with DMSO, drugs that inhibit importin palmitoylation (10μM Wnt-C59) drugs that enhance importin palmitoylation (50μM palmostatin), and drugs that inhibit importin cargo binding (25μM ivermectin) or cargo release (40μM importazole). Yellow arrows indicate cortical poles and white arrows indicate lateral cortex. Scale bar=5μm. Cell boundaries determined by brightfield. B-D) Quantification of importin α localization in drug treated cells. Measurements of importin α signal intensity were made at three cellular locations: polar cortex, lateral cortex and cytoplasm. Polar cortex measurements were made for each cell at the pole with the higher measure of intensity, a similar method was used for lateral cortex measurements and cytoplasm measurements were made at the midline of the cell. These measurements were normalized to each other on a cell-by-cell basis by determining the ratio of cortical vs lateral importin α, cortical vs cytosolic importin α, and lateral vs cytosolic importin α. Mean +/− SEM n=60 from 2 replicates **=p<0.01 determined by Student’s t-test. E) Western blot of HCT116 cell fractions following subcellular fractionation to separate PM, cytoplasmic, organelle, and nuclear fractions. PM and cytoplasmic fractions shown. Western blots were immunostained for PMCA1 (PM marker), β-tubulin (cytoplasmic marker), and importin α (KPNA2). F) Cartoon representation of a metaphase cell with misoriented spindles mounted on a coverslip indicating the angle, α, which was measured as the arctangent of the horizontal distance, z, over the vertical distance, x, between the two centrosomes to determine the angle of spindle structures. G) Immunofluorescence images of metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells in presence of DMSO or 10μM Wnt-C59 stained for NuMA. DMSO treated cell represents a properly oriented cell with a spindle angle of 0 degrees relative to the parallel of the coverslip the cells were mounted on. Wnt-C59 treated cell represents a severely misoriented cell with a spindle angle of 90 degrees relative to the parallel of the coverslip the cells were mounted on. Scale bar=5μm H) Quantification of mitotic spindle angles for metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells incubated in DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59, 50μM palmostatin, 40μM importazole, 25μM ivermectin, or 100μM 2-bromopalmitate for 1 hour prior to analysis. All drug treatments except palmostatin significantly increased the mean spindle angle of metaphase cells relative to a DMSO control. Mean +/− SEM, n=60 mitotic cells from 2 replicates *=p<0.05 **=p<0.01 ***=p<0.001 ****=p<0.0001 determined by Student’s t-test. Refer to Materials & Methods for method of determining spindle angle. I) Immunofluorescence images of metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells transfected via nucleofection with importin α-mCherry-HA-CaaX and incubated in either DMSO or 10μM Wnt-C59 for 1 hour prior to analysis stained for NuMA. Scale bar=5μm. J) Quantification of mitotic spindle angles for metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells incubated with DMSO or 10μM Wnt-C59 expressing importin α-mCherry-HA or importin α-mCherry-HA-CaaX. Cells expressing importin α-mCherry-HA-CaaX showed no spindle misorientation when treated with Wnt-C59. Mean +/− SEM, n=60 mitotic cells from 2 replicates *=p<0.05 ****=p<0.0001 determined by Student’s t-test. K) Immunofluorescence images of metaphase-arrested RPE-1 cells incubated with DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59, or 50μM palmostatin for 1 hour prior to analysis stained for γ-tubulin. DMSO treated cells are representative of cells with properly oriented spindles. Wnt-C59 treated cells were significantly misoriented and palmostatin treated cells were properly oriented when compared to DMSO control. Scale bar=5μm L) Quantification of mitotic spindle angles for metaphase-arrested RPE-1 cells incubated with DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59 or 50μM palmostatin for 1 hour prior to analysis. Wnt-C59 treatment significantly increased the mean spindle angle of metaphase cells relative to a DMSO control while palmostatin treatment did not significantly increase the mean spindle angle relative to a DMSO control. Mean +/− SEM, n=60 mitotic cells from 2 replicates *=p<0.05 determined by Student’s t-test.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Importin α Interacts with NuMA, but not Dlg at the Metaphase Cell Cortex in a Palmitoylation Dependent Manner.
A) Western blot of NuMA immunoprecipitation from HCT116 cells treated with DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59 or 50μM palmostatin for 1 hour prior to analysis. Immunoprecipitation of NuMA followed by importin α and NuMA western blot. B) Schematic of PLA quantification. ROIs of quantification represented by dashed lines. C) Immunofluorescence images of DuoLink proximity ligation assay (PLA) probing interaction of NuMA with importin α (KPNA2) in interphase and metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells in the presence of DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59 or 50μM palmostatin for 1 hour prior to analysis. White dashed lines indicate cell borders as determined by brightfield images. Scale bar=5μm. D) Quantification of the percentage of importin α (KPNA2)-NuMA PLA foci at the polar cortex, lateral cortex and cytoplasm in DMSO, Wnt-C59 and palmostatin-treated cells. Foci were enriched at the polar cortex in DMSO treated cells, the cytoplasm in Wnt-C59 treated cells, and the lateral cortex in palmostatin treated cells. Mean +/− SEM, n>136 foci *=p<0.05 ****=p<0.0001 determined by Student’s t-test. E) Immunofluorescence images of DuoLink PLA probing interaction of Dlg with importin α (KPNA2) in interphase and metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells in the presence of DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59 or 50μM palmostatin. White dashed lines indicate cell borders. Scale bar=5μm. F) Quantification of the percentage of importin α (KPNA2)-Dlg PLA foci at the polar cortex, lateral cortex and cytoplasm in DMSO, Wnt-C59 and palmostatin treated cells. Localization of PLA foci did not change across three drug treatments. Mean +/− SEM, n>297 foci, all data points are non-significant as determined by Student’s t-test. G) Immunofluorescence images of DuoLink proximity ligation assay probing interaction of NuMA with nucleofected importin α constructs (KPNA2-HA-mCherry and KPNA2-HA-mCherry-CaaX) in interphase and metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells in the presence of DMSO or 10μM Wnt-C59 for 1 hour prior to analysis. White dashed lines indicate cell borders as determined by brightfield images. Scale bar=5μm. H) Quantification of the percentage of nucleofected importin α constructs(KPNA2)-NuMA PLA foci at the polar cortex, lateral cortex and cytoplasm in Wnt-C59 treated cells. Cells nucleofected with KPNA2-HA and treated with Wnt-C59 did not exhibit enrichment of foci at the PM and instead showed foci throughout the cell. Cells nucleofected with KPNA2-HA-CaaX and treated with Wnt-C59 exhibited foci enrichment at the PM indicating that expression of KPNA2-HA-CaaX rescued the effects of Wnt-C59 treatment. Mean +/− SEM, n>195 foci *=p<0.05 determined by Student’s t-test. I) Western blot of importin α, NuMA and β-tubulin in metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells in the presence of DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59, 50μM Palmostatin, 40μM importazole, 25μM ivermectin, or 100μM 2-bromopalmitate. J and K) Quantification of NuMA and importin α (KPNA2) expression levels respectively, relative to β-tubulin protein levels for each condition.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Palmitoylated Importin α Regulates Cortical Localization of NuMA and Dynein/Dynactin in Metaphase.
A) Confocal images of NuMA localization in metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells in the presence of DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59, 50μM palmostatin, 40μM importazole or 25μM ivermectin. Yellow arrows indicate cortical poles and white arrows indicate lateral cortex. Scale bar=5μm. B-D) Quantification of NuMA localization in drug treated cells. Measurements of NuMA signal intensity were made at three cellular locations: polar cortex, lateral cortex and cytoplasm. Polar cortex measurements were made for each cell at the pole with the higher measure of intensity, a similar method was used for lateral cortex measurements and cytoplasm measurements were made at the midline of the cell. These measurements were normalized on a cell-by-cell basis by determining the ratio of polar vs lateral NuMA, polar vs cytosolic NuMA, and lateral vs cytosolic NuMA. Mean +/− SEM n>40 *=p<0.05 **=p<0.01 ***=p<0.001 ****=p<0.0001 determined by Student’s t-test. E) Immunofluorescence images of p150Glued localization in metaphase-arrested HCT116 cells treated with either DMSO, 10μM Wnt-C59, or 50μM palmostatin. Yellow arrows indicate cortical poles and white arrows indicate lateral cortex. Scale bar=5μm. F-H) Quantification of p150Glued localization in drug-treated cells. Measurements of p150Glued signal intensity were made at three cellular locations: polar cortex, lateral cortex and cytoplasm. Polar cortex measurements were made for each cell at the pole with the higher measure of intensity, the same method being used for lateral cortex measurements and cytoplasm measurements at the midline of the cell. These measurements were normalized on a cell-by-cell basis by determining the ratio of polar vs lateral p150Glued, polar vs cytosolic p150Glued, and lateral vs cytosolic p150Glued. Mean +/− SEM n=60 *=p<0.05 determined by Student’s t-test.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Regulation of Palmitoylation is Required for Proper Brain Development in Xenopus laevis.
A) Bright field images of NF stage 42 X. laevis grown in the presence of DMSO, 100μM Wnt-C59 or 1mM palmostatin. Scale bar=500μm B) Measurements of drug treated stage 42 X. laevis head shape by 3 metrics: distance between eyes, snout length, and overall head area. All 3 metrics of head shape were significantly altered from DMSO control in both Wnt-C59 and palmostatin treatments. Mean +/− SEM n>55 *=p<0.05 ***=p<0.001 ****=p<0.0001 determined by Student’s t-test. C) Immunofluorescence images of DMSO treated NF stage 46 X. laevis immunostained for the neuroprogenitor marker nestin and stained with Hoechst to visualize DNA. Scale bar=250μm. D) Quantification of total cell count in forebrains and percentage of forebrain cells positive for nestin signal in NF stage 46 X. laevis grown in the presence of DMSO, 100μM Wnt-C59 or 1mM palmostatin. Quantifications were performed on maximum projection images from z-stack images of X. laevis brains with a parent-child analysis to determine the number of total cells as determined by Hoechst signal that also were positive for nestin signal. All Wnt-C59 treated X. laevis embryos died before reaching NF stage 46 while all palmostatin treated X. laevis display a significantly reduced neuroprogenitor population by nestin positive cell count. Mean +/− SEM n=12 ***=p<0.001 determined by Student’s t-test.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Overexpression of CaaX Modified Importin α in the Developing X. laevis Brain Partially Rescues Developmental Defects due to PORCN Inhibition.
A) Confocal images of NF stage 42 X. laevis brains from X. laevis grown in the presence of DMSO or 100μM Wnt-C59 immunostained for phospho-histone H3, a marker of actively dividing cells. Scale bar = 250μm. B) Confocal images of NF stage 42 X. laevis brains from X. laevis expressing importin α modified with a c-terminal CaaX domain which forces cortical localization via farnesylation and grown in the presence of 100μM Wnt-C59 immunostained for phospho-histone H3 and the modified importin α-CaaX construct. C) Confocal images of NF stage 42 X. laevis brains from X. laevis expressing an mCherry construct modified with a c-terminal CaaX domain and grown in the presence of 100μM Wnt-C59 immunostained for phospho-histone H3 and the modified CaaX construct. D) Quantification of the number of phospho-histone H3 positive cells in stage 42 X. laevis brains of X. laevis grown in the presence of DMSO or 100μM Wnt-C59 and expressing importin α-CaaX or mCherry-CaaX. Wnt-C59 treated X. laevis embryos showed a significantly reduced number of phospho-histone H3 positive cells in the brain compared to DMSO treated X. laevis. X. laevis embryos expressing importin α-CaaX in the brain display a partial rescue of the reduced phospho-histone H3 levels which was not recapitulated in X. laevis expressing mCherry-CaaX. Mean +/− SEM n>10 *=p<0.05 ****=p<0.0001 determined by Student’s t-test.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Importin α regulates mitotic spindle orientation through mediating NuMA localization to the metaphase cortex and maintenance at the cell cortex through anaphase in a palmitoylation dependent manner.
Proposed model of palmitoylated importin α’s role in astral microtubule anchoring as a transporter of NuMA and a scaffold at the cell cortex for astral microtubule anchoring proteins to maintain cortical localization throughout metaphase and anaphase.

References

    1. Alam S.M. 2018. Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA). Curr Protoc Immunol. 123. doi: 10.1002/cpim.58.Proximity. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aleksander S.A., Balhoff J., Carbon S., Cherry J.M., Drabkin H.J., Ebert D., Feuermann M., Gaudet P., Harris N.L., Hill D.P., Lee R., Mi H., Moxon S., Mungall C.J., Muruganugan A., Mushayahama T., Sternberg P.W., Thomas P.D., Van Auken K., Ramsey J., Siegele D.A., Chisholm R.L., Fey P., Aspromonte M.C., Nugnes M.V., Quaglia F., Tosatto S., Giglio M., Nadendla S., Antonazzo G., Attrill H., Dos Santos G., Marygold S., Strelets V., Tabone C.J., Thurmond J., Zhou P., Ahmed S.H., Asanitthong P., Luna Buitrago D., Erdol M.N., Gage M.C., Ali Kadhum M., Li K.Y.C., Long M., Michalak A., Pesala A., Pritazahra A., Saverimuttu S.C.C., Su R., Thurlow K.E., Lovering R.C., Logie C., Oliferenko S., Blake J., Christie K., Corbani L., Dolan M.E., Ni L., Sitnikov D., Smith C., Cuzick A., Seager J., Cooper L., Elser J., Jaiswal P., Gupta P., Naithani S., Lera-Ramirez M., Rutherford K., Wood V., De Pons J.L., Dwinell M.R., Hayman G.T., Kaldunski M.L., Kwitek A.E., Laulederkind S.J.F., Tutaj M.A., Vedi M., Wang S.J., D’Eustachio P., Aimo L., Axelsen K., Bridge A., Hyka-Nouspikel N., Morgat A., Engel S.R., Karra K., Miyasato S.R., Nash R.S., Skrzypek M.S., Weng S., Wong E.D., Bakker E., Berardini T.Z., Reiser L., Auchincloss A., Argoud-Puy G., et al. 2023. The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023. Genetics. 224:1–14. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyad031. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anjur-Dietrich M.I., Gomez Hererra V., Farhadifar R., Wu H., Merta H., Bahmanyar S., Shelley M.J., and Needleman D.J.. 2024. Mechanics of spindle orientation in human mitotic cells is determined by pulling forces on astral microtubules and clustering of cortical dynein. Dev. Cell. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.05.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., Davis A.P., Dolinski K., Dwight S.S., Eppig J.T., Harris M.A., Hill D.P., Kasarskis L.I.-T.A., Lewis S., Matese J.C., Richardson J.E., Ringwald M., Rubin G.M., and Sherlock G.. 2000. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25:25–29. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180522105202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergstralh D.T., Dawney N.S., and St Johnston D.. 2017. Spindle orientation: A question of complex positioning. Dev. 144:1137–1145. doi: 10.1242/dev.140764. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types