This is a preprint.
Reward invigorates isometric gripping actions
- PMID: 39484502
- PMCID: PMC11527115
- DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.25.620324
Reward invigorates isometric gripping actions
Update in
-
Reward invigorates isometric gripping actions.J Neurophysiol. 2025 Apr 1;133(4):1282-1294. doi: 10.1152/jn.00384.2024. Epub 2025 Mar 17. J Neurophysiol. 2025. PMID: 40094713
Abstract
Individuals exhibit a propensity to move faster toward more rewarding stimuli. While this phenomenon has been observed in movements, the effect of reward on implicit control of isometric actions, like gripping or grasping, is relatively unknown. How reward-related invigoration generalizes to other effortful actions is an important question. Reward invigorates reaching movements and saccades, supporting the idea that reward pays the additional effort cost of moving faster. Effort in isometric force generation is less understood, so here we ask whether and how reward-related invigoration generalizes to isometric force gripping. And if so, what implicit characteristics of gripping change when there is a prospect of reward? Participants (N=19) gripped a force transducer and the force applied was mapped to radial position of an onscreen cursor. Each trial, a target appeared in one of four locations; increasing grip force moved the cursor toward the target. The gripping action was interchangeable for all target positions. In each block of 100 trials, one target was consistently rewarded, while the other targets were not. When gripping to acquire the rewarded target, participants reacted faster, generated force more rapidly and to a greater extent, while intriguingly maintaining the same accuracy and integral of force over time. These findings support the generalization of reward-related invigoration in isometric force tasks, and that the brain exquisitely trades-off reward and effort costs to obtain reward more rapidly without compromising accuracy or more effort costs than necessary.
New & noteworthy: Gripping actions are important for day-to-day tasks, for medical diagnostics like strength and force control, and for choice selection in decision-making experiments. Comparing isometric gripping responses to reward and nonreward cues, we observed reward-based invigoration mediated by selective increases in effort. These findings can be leveraged to provide additional insight into the decision making process, and better understand the effect of reward on movement vigor and the implicit control of accuracy.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources