Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Mar 1;21(3):573-582.
doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11460.

Performance of consumer wrist-worn sleep tracking devices compared to polysomnography: a meta-analysis

Young Jeong Lee  1 , Jae Yong Lee  1 , Jae Hoon Cho  2 , Yun Jin Kang  3 , Ji Ho Choi  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Performance of consumer wrist-worn sleep tracking devices compared to polysomnography: a meta-analysis

Young Jeong Lee et al. J Clin Sleep Med. .

Abstract

Study objectives: The use of sleep tracking devices is increasing as people become more aware of the importance of sleep and interested in monitoring their patterns. With many devices on the market, we conducted a meta-analysis comparing sleep scoring data from consumer wrist-worn sleep tracking devices with polysomnography to validate the accuracy of these devices.

Methods: We retrieved studies from the databases of SCOPUS, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and KoreaMed and OVID Medline up to March 2024. We compared personal data about participants and information on objective sleep parameters.

Results: From 24 studies, data of 798 patient using Fitbit, Jawbone, myCadian watch, WHOOP strap, Garmin, Basis B1, Zulu Watch, Huami Arc, E4 wristband, Fatigue Science Readiband, Apple Watch, or Xiaomi Mi Band 5 were analyzed. There were significant differences in total sleep time (mean difference, -16.854; 95% confidence interval, [-26.332; -7.375]), sleep efficiency (mean difference, -4.691; 95% confidence interval, [-7.079; -2.302]), sleep latency (mean difference, 2.574; 95% confidence interval, [0.606; 4.542]), and wake after sleep onset (mean difference, 13.255; 95% confidence interval, [4.522; 21.988]) between all consumer sleep tracking devices and polysomnography. In subgroup analysis, there was no significant difference in wake after sleep onset between Fitbit and polysomnography. There was also no significant difference in sleep latency between other devices and polysomnography. Fitbit measured sleep latency longer than other devices, and other devices measured wake after sleep onset longer. Based on Begg and Egger's test, there was no publication bias in total sleep time and sleep efficiency.

Conclusions: Wrist-worn sleep tracking devices, although popular, are not as reliable as polysomnography in measuring key sleep parameters such as total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and sleep latency. Physicians and consumers should be aware of their limitations and interpret results carefully, though they can still be useful for tracking general sleep patterns. Further improvements and clinical studies are needed to enhance their accuracy.

Citation: Lee YJ, Lee JY, Cho JH, Kang YJ, Choi JH. Performance of consumer wrist-worn sleep tracking devices compared to polysomnography: a meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(3):573-582.

Keywords: consumer sleep tracking device; polysomnography; sleep scoring data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have seen and approved the manuscript. Work for this study was performed at the Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine. This study was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Hirshkowitz M . Normal human sleep: an overview . Med Clin North Am. 2004. ; 88 ( 3 ): 551 – 565 . - PubMed
    1. Berry RB , Quan SF , Abreu AR , et al. ; for the American Academy of Sleep Medicine . The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events: Rules, Terminology and Technical Specifications. Version 2.6 . Darien, IL: : American Academy of Sleep Medicine; ; 2020. .
    1. Alvarez GG , Ayas NT . The impact of daily sleep duration on health: a review of the literature . Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2004. ; 19 ( 2 ): 56 – 59 . - PubMed
    1. Kushida CA , Littner MR , Morgenthaler T , et al. . Practice parameters for the indications for polysomnography and related procedures: an update for 2005 . Sleep. 2005. ; 28 ( 4 ): 499 – 521 . - PubMed
    1. Epstein LJ , Kristo D , Strollo PJ Jr , et al. . Clinical guideline for the evaluation, management and long-term care of obstructive sleep apnea in adults . J Clin Sleep Med. 2009. ; 5 ( 3 ): 263 – 276 . - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources