The historical transformation of individual concepts into populational ones: an explanatory shift in the gestation of the modern synthesis
- PMID: 39485612
- DOI: 10.1007/s40656-024-00638-2
The historical transformation of individual concepts into populational ones: an explanatory shift in the gestation of the modern synthesis
Abstract
In this paper, I will conduct three interrelated analyses. First, I will develop an analysis of various concepts in the history of biology that used to refer to individual-level phenomena but were then reinterpreted by the Modern Synthesis in terms of populations. Second, a similar situation can be found in contemporary evolutionary theory. While different approaches reflect on the causal role of developing organisms in evolution, proponents of the Modern Synthesis refrain from any substantial change by reinterpreting and explaining individual-level phenomena from a population perspective. Finally, I will approach these historical and contemporary debates by arguing for the statistical reading of natural selection, which holds that explanations by natural selection are statistical. My main conclusion is that the historical conceptual reinterpretations belong to a new explanatory strategy developed by the Modern Synthesis based on population thinking. Adopting the statistical point of view has three advantages for the issues discussed in this paper. First, understanding historical conceptual change as part of an explanatory shift fits with the emergence of population biology as a discipline that employs statistical methods. Second, concerning current debates in evolutionary biology, the statisticalist reading can validate the goal of both sides of the dispute. It ascribes an invaluable role to the population statistical explanation of the MS and also commends the study of developmental and organismal causes of adaptive evolution. Finally, the division of explanatory roles in evolutionary biology, embarrassed by statisticalism, can be related to the different interpretations that important biological concepts have undergone throughout history and contemporary biology, i.e., that the division of explanatory roles allows for a division of conceptual interpretations.
Keywords: Conceptual change in biology; Evolutionary causation; Evolutionary explanations; History of biology; Statisticalism.
© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
Chance as an explanatory factor in evolutionary biology.Hist Philos Life Sci. 1991;13(2):249-68. Hist Philos Life Sci. 1991. PMID: 1801049
-
Probabilistic causation and the explanatory role of natural selection.Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Sep;42(3):344-55. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 9. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011. PMID: 21802638
-
What was historical about natural history? Contingency and explanation in the science of living things.Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016 Aug;58:8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.012. Epub 2016 Jan 19. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016. PMID: 26795077
-
Evolutionary developmental biology: its concepts and history with a focus on Russian and German contributions.Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Nov;97(11):951-69. doi: 10.1007/s00114-010-0720-9. Epub 2010 Sep 24. Naturwissenschaften. 2010. PMID: 20865238 Review.
-
The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis.Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Jun;91(6):255-76. doi: 10.1007/s00114-004-0515-y. Epub 2004 Mar 17. Naturwissenschaften. 2004. PMID: 15241603 Review.
References
-
- Abrams, M. (2012). Measured, modeled, and causal conceptions of fitness. Frontiers in Genetics, 3, 196. - DOI
-
- Ågren, J. A. (2021). The gene’s-eye view of evolution. Oxford University Press.
-
- Amundson, R. (2005). The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Press.
-
- Areiw, A., & Lewontin, R. (2004). The confusions of fitness. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55(2), 347–363. - DOI
-
- Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr’s ultimate/proximate distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy, 18(4), 553–565. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources