Issues in the Adoption of Online Medical Care: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey
- PMID: 39486019
- PMCID: PMC11568393
- DOI: 10.2196/64159
Issues in the Adoption of Online Medical Care: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey
Erratum in
-
Correction: Issues in the Adoption of Online Medical Care: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 27;26:e68439. doi: 10.2196/68439. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39602799 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: Telemedicine, or online medical care, has gained considerable attention worldwide. However, it has not been widely adopted in Japan, and the detailed status of received and provided online medical care and the reasons for its lack of popularity remain unknown.
Objective: This study aims to investigate the current status of online medical care in Japan and the factors limiting its adoption from the perspective of both patients receiving and medical professionals providing online medical care.
Methods: In total, 2 nationwide questionnaire surveys were conducted. The first survey, targeting both patients and healthy individuals, screened approximately 40,000 participants among 13 million people. The participants were selected to match the age distribution of the Japanese population based on government data, and their online medical care experience and medical visit status were recorded. To further investigate online medical care use and satisfaction, a web-based survey was conducted with 15% (6000/40,000) of the screened participants. The second survey, targeting medical professionals, was administered to a physician, a nurse, and a member of the administrative staff in each of 4900 randomly selected medical facilities to inquire about their online medical care practices and impressions. In addition, both surveys investigated the factors limiting online medical care expansion in Japan.
Results: The response rates among patients and healthy individuals targeted for the screening and main surveys were 92.5% (36,998/40,000) and ˃80% (1312/1478, 88.77%; 1281/1522, 84.17%; 404/478, 84.5%; and 2226/2522, 88.26% in 4 survey groups), respectively. The survey of medical professionals yielded 1552 responses (n=618, 39.82% physicians; n=428, 27.58% nurses; n=506, 32.6% administrative staff). Although the facility-level response rate was low (794/4900, 16.2%), some facility categories had relatively high response rates. Only 5.29% (1956/36,998) of the patients and healthy individuals had online medical care experience. When there were more hospitals nearby and they felt it was more work to see a physician in person, they were more likely to use online medical care (more nearby hospitals: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50; more work: aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.35-1.63 per survey response point in the patient group). Similarly, these factors were substantially associated with satisfaction (more nearby hospitals: aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.14-1.73; more work: aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.27-1.76 per survey response point in the patient group). In both surveys, the most frequently selected factor preventing the widespread use of online medical care was patients' need to switch to face-to-face medical care for mandatory tests and procedures. Inadequate awareness of and education on online medical care were also frequently selected.
Conclusions: Our nationwide surveys provided insights into the current status of online medical care in Japan and simultaneously identified several problems and issues related to it, which will be useful in promoting its wider adoption.
Keywords: eHealth; mobile phone; online medical care; telehealth; telemedicine.
©Yuka Sugawara, Yosuke Hirakawa, Masao Iwagami, Haruo Kuroki, Shuhei Mitani, Ataru Inagaki, Hiroki Ohashi, Mitsuru Kubota, Soichi Koike, Rie Wakimizu, Masaomi Nangaku. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 01.11.2024.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Health Maintenance Organization-mHealth Versus Face-to-Face Interaction for Health Care in Israel: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 30;26:e55350. doi: 10.2196/55350. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 39348674 Free PMC article.
-
E-health literacy and associated factors among chronic patients in a low-income country: a cross-sectional survey.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01202-1. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020. PMID: 32762745 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Online Hospitals and Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Medical Services in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 5;9(2):e25960. doi: 10.2196/25960. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 33444155 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Reported Patient and Provider Satisfaction With Neurology Telemedicine Visits After Rapid Telemedicine Implementation in an Urban Academic Center: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 30;8:e53491. doi: 10.2196/53491. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 39476368 Free PMC article.
-
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39324475 Review.
Cited by
-
Authors' Reply: Japan's Telepsychiatry Dissemination: Current Status and Challenges.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e69798. doi: 10.2196/69798. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 39832363 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Challenges and Adaptive Strategies in Transitional Care During COVID-19: A Qualitative Study of Nurses' Experiences in Japan.Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 7;15(6):207. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060207. Nurs Rep. 2025. PMID: 40559498 Free PMC article.
-
Japan's Telepsychiatry Dissemination: Current Status and Challenges.J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 20;27:e22849. doi: 10.2196/22849. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 39832367 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Telehealth, telemedicine, and telecare: what's what? Federal Communications Commission. 2024. [2024-05-27]. https://www.fcc.gov/general/telehealth-telemedicine-and-telecare-whats-what .
-
- Guidelines for the appropriate implementation of online medical care. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2022. Feb 28, [2024-05-27]. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/12601000/000901835.pdf .
-
- Maugeri A, Barchitta M, Basile G, Agodi A. Public and research interest in telemedicine from 2017 to 2022: Infodemiology study of Google trends data and bibliometric analysis of scientific literature. J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 16;26:e50088. doi: 10.2196/50088. https://www.jmir.org/2024//e50088/ v26i1e50088 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Koonin LM, Hoots B, Tsang CA, Leroy Z, Farris K, Jolly B, Antall P, McCabe B, Zelis CB, Tong I, Harris AM. Trends in the use of telehealth during the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic - United States, January-March 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1595–1599. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6943a3 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- von der Groeben S, Czaplicki A, Hegerl U, Reich H. Telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: results from three nationally representative surveys on use, attitudes and barriers among adults affected by depression. Internet Interv. 2023 Apr;32:100622. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100622. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2214-7829(23)00022-2 S2214-7829(23)00022-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical