Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec:177:112384.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112384. Epub 2024 Oct 28.

Gait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithm

Affiliations

Gait event detection accuracy: Effects of amputee gait pattern, terrain and algorithm

Eugenia Soledad Muñoz-Larrosa et al. J Biomech. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Several kinematic-based algorithms have shown accuracy for gait event detection in unimpaired and pathological gait. However, their validation in subjects with lower limb amputation while walking on different terrains is still limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of three kinematic-based algorithms: Coordinate-Based Algorithm (CBA), Velocity-Based Algorithm (VBA) and High-Pass Filtered Algorithms (HPA) for detection of gait events in subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation walking on different terrains. Twelve subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation, using a hydraulic ankle prosthesis, walked at self-selected walking speed, on level ground and up and down a slope. Detection of Initial Contact (IC) and Foot Off (FO) by the three algorithms for intact and prosthetic limbs was compared with detection by force platforms using the True Error (TE) (time difference in detection). Mean TE found for over 100 events analysed per condition were smaller than 40 ms for both events in all conditions (approximately 6 % of stance phase). Significant interactions (p < 0.01) were found between terrain and algorithm, limb and algorithm, and also a main effect for the algorithm. Post-hoc analyses indicate that the algorithm, the limb and the terrain had an effect on the accuracy in detection. If an accuracy of 40 ms is acceptable for the particular application, then all three algorithms can be used for event detection in amputee gait. However, if accuracy in detection of events is crucial for the intended application, an evaluation of the algorithms in pathological gait walking on the terrain of interest is recommended.

Keywords: Foot Off; Initial Contact; Level Ground; Ramp; Slope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

LinkOut - more resources