Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):1332.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11826-y.

Therapeutic approaches and conceptions of practice of osteopaths in Australia - a national cross-sectional study and exploratory factor analysis of the Osteo-TAQ

Affiliations

Therapeutic approaches and conceptions of practice of osteopaths in Australia - a national cross-sectional study and exploratory factor analysis of the Osteo-TAQ

Oliver P Thomson et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Health professionals develop their own approach to patient care based on education, experience and philosophical stance. Literature suggests that this practice approach informs patient care, and clinical outcomes. The Osteopaths' Therapeutic Approaches Questionnaire (Osteo-TAQ) is a novel 36-item instrument developed from qualitative grounded theory research with osteopaths in the United Kingdom. The aim of the study was to develop evidence for the structural and construct validity of the Osteo-TAQ in the Australian osteopathic profession and provide initial descriptive data about the therapeutic approaches of osteopaths in Australia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used to collect data from registered osteopaths in Australia using the Osteo-TAQ and analysed with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). The EFA utilised parallel analysis to determine the number of factors to extract and McDonald's omega calculated as the reliability estimation statistic.

Results: 691 Australian osteopaths provided data for the study, representing 25% of the Australian osteopathic profession. Empirically the number of factors to extract based on the parallel analysis was seven. Two- and three-factor solutions were evaluated given the underpinning theory identifying two conceptions of practice and three interrelated therapeutic approaches. Both the two- and three-factor solutions were consistent with the underpinning theory with acceptable reliability estimations for each factor. Descriptive data suggested the most common element of the therapeutic approach of Australian osteopaths was establishing rapport, while the least common was 'only talking' with their patients.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence for the structural, content and construct validity of the Osteo-TAQ in an Australian osteopathic practitioner population. The results support both a two- and three-factor structure for the Osteo-TAQ in an Australian osteopathic population, with each factor demonstrating acceptable reliability estimations supporting the items comprising each factor as measuring a single construct. From a theoretical and empirical perspective, it can be inferred that the Osteo-TAQ tool encapsulates an osteopaths' conception of practice (professional artistry and technical rational) and three main therapeutic approaches to patient care: Educator, Communicator and Treater. Further research is required to explore each of these therapeutic approaches to better understand how they relate to an individual osteopath's conception of practice, and their associations with other measures of practice including clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Grounded theory; Osteopath; Osteopathic Medicine; Osteopathy; Therapeutic approach; Workforce.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

OT is an Associate Editor for BMC Health Service Research but was not involved with any peer-review or editorial decisions regarding this manuscript. All other authors have no competing interests.

References

    1. The OIA global report. Global review of osteopathic medicine and osteopathy 2020 – osteopathic international alliance. https://oialliance.org/the-oia-global-report-global-review-of-osteopathi.... Accessed 17 Nov 2021.
    1. Ellwood J, Carnes D. An international profile of the practice of osteopaths: a systematic review of surveys. Int J Osteopath Med. 2021;40:14–21. - DOI
    1. Cotton A. Osteopathic principles in the modern world. Int J Osteopath Med. 2013;16:17–24. - DOI
    1. Kasiri-Martino H, Bright P. Osteopathic educators’ attitudes towards osteopathic principles and their application in clinical practice: a qualitative inquiry. Man Ther. 2016;21:233–40. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Keeffe M, Cullinane P, Hurley J, Leahy I, Bunzli S, O’Sullivan PB, O’Sullivan K. What influences patient-therapist interactions in Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy? Qualitative systematic review and Meta-synthesis. Phys Ther. 2016;96:609–22. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources