Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jan;82(1):103314.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103314. Epub 2024 Nov 2.

General Surgery Versus Integrated Surgical Sub-specialties: Predictors for Residency Match and Interview Invites Among Surgical Candidates

Affiliations
Comparative Study

General Surgery Versus Integrated Surgical Sub-specialties: Predictors for Residency Match and Interview Invites Among Surgical Candidates

Yoshiko Iwai et al. J Surg Educ. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to assess predictive factors for receiving interviews and matching in general surgery (GS), cardiothoracic surgery (TS), vascular surgery (VS), and plastic surgery (PS).

Design: The Texas Seeking Transparency in Applications to Residency (STAR) survey was analyzed for match years 2018-2023. Chi-Square Tests of Independence were used to assess differences among participants who received ≥16 vs <16 interviews and, separately, participants who matched vs went unmatched. Odds ratios (OR) for matching were adjusted for board scores, home region, publications, and honors in applicant specialty.

Setting: All US medical schools participating in the Texas STAR survey from 2018-2023.

Participants: All fourth-year students who completed the survey during the study period.

Results: Of the 2,687 individuals included, 78.15% applied in GS, 13.58% in PS, 4.43% in VS, and 3.82% in TS. Participants had higher odds of receiving ≥16 interviews when having >240 step 1 score vs ≤239 (OR 1.76 (95% CI 1.46-2.12); p < 0.001), >250 step 2 score vs ≤249 (2.42 (2.00-2.91); p < 0.001), honors in their specialty (1.48 (1.21-1.80); p < 0.001), and >5 publications vs ≤4 (1.46 (1.16-1.83); p = 0.001). Odds of matching were lower among PS (0.50 (0.36-0.69); p < 0.001) and TS (0.2 (0.13-0.31); <0.001) compared to GS applicants. Participants had higher odds of matching when having >240 step 1 score vs ≤239 (1.33 (1.04-1.70); p = 0.026), >250 step 2 score vs ≤249 (1.52 (1.20-1.92); p < 0.001), and were more likely to match at a program where they indicated a geographic preference (5.49 (2.58-11.66); p < 0.0001) or program signal (3.87 (1.85-8.11); p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The novel geographic preferencing and program signal functions were associated with increased match success. More studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.

Keywords: ERAS; Residency match; etc; general surgery; geographic preference; program signals; residency application; vascular surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources