Navigating challenges in recipient selection for end-chain kidneys
- PMID: 39490413
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.10.018
Navigating challenges in recipient selection for end-chain kidneys
Abstract
As a result of the increasing number of transplants being facilitated by kidney paired donation and newer initiatives such as voucher donation, end-chain (EC) kidneys now constitute a considerable proportion of kidney paired donation transplants in the United States. Data on EC kidneys are limited. They may be lower in quality compared with non-EC living donor kidneys. However, they can provide unique opportunities for recipient candidates without living donors. There are no data or algorithms available to guide recipient selection for EC kidneys accepted by a transplant center. Considering the ethical principles of utility, justice, and respect for persons that underlie organ allocation, we discuss 3 potential approaches for recipient selection: (1) adherence to the kidney allocation system, (2) utility maximization; and (3) priority to high-risk candidates, along with examples from our own center's experience. Similar considerations are also relevant to selection of recipients for nondirected donor organs and to out-of-sequence allocation for deceased organ donors. Because EC kidneys represent an increasing proportion of kidney paired donation-facilitated living kidney donor transplantation in the United States and will likely get more medically and surgically complex over time, ongoing research on their utilization and outcomes is needed.
Keywords: end-chain kidneys; ethics; kidney paired donation; living kidney donor transplantation; outcomes; paired kidney donation; race.
Copyright © 2024 American Society of Transplantation & American Society of Transplant Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interests The authors of this manuscript have conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. C.T. is a member of the OPTN MPSC, the ASTS Ethics Committee, the TTS Ethics Committee, and AST PSECOP Executive Committee. The views expressed in this manuscript are her own and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), nor any other organization with which she is affiliated.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
